Advancing to... 1949?


Posted by Helena Cobban
March 4, 2010 10:18 PM EST | Link
Filed in Palestine 2010

So now, Washington's "leadership" of the Palestinian-Israeli diplomacy looks poised to rush forward to... 1949, and the proximity talks that Ralph Bunche convened in Rhodes that year.

Haaretz's reporters tell us there,

    the American administration is hoping the sides will declare the beginning of indirect talks [on Sunday] morning, ahead of the arrival of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden on Monday.
These "proximity talks" have been touted by U.S. officials as some kind of big deal, even though they are a major step back from what Obama was promising when he came into office 14 months ago.

The P.A. leadership has until now merely been asking that, if the Netanyahu government wants to talk, it should first comply with its own commitments under the 2002 Road Map. But they've gotten no support from Washington for that position, and Washington has been putting big pressure on Abu Mazen, including through Egypt, Jordan, etc., with the aim of getting him back into talks-- any talks, never mind about what!

The problem is not whether the two "sides" talk to each other; or how close they are when they take; or what shape table or configuration of hotel they might employ. The problem is getting Israel to end its illegal occupation of Palestinian land.

When Saddam Hussein occupied Kuwait in 1990, was Pres. G.H. W. Bush concerned about getting Iraqi and Kuwaiti leaders into a room together-- or in rooms in the same hotel together-- to "negotiate" a resolution? Of course he wasn't... Although, just possibly, there might have been a negotiated outcome to have been had. But he never gave anyone a serious chance to explore that avenue. Five and a half months after Saddam's forces moved into Kuwait, the international alliance that Bush brought together acted swiftly to evict them.

In the OPTs, the occupation has now gone on for nearly 43 years.

Israel has no more claim to the West Bank, Gaza, and Golan than Iraq had to Kuwait. Claims of "holy places" and such don't confer sovereign rights. Everywhere in the world, people have places they consider somehow sacred in other countries... and they go to visit them on pilgrimages. That's how it is.

International law concerns itself with quite different matters; and in the matter of the Israeli-occupied lands the Security Council has clearly stated the inacceptability of Israel's acquisition of those territories by force.

... In Palestine meanwhile, Abu Mazen's apparent decision to take part in the upcoming "proximity talks" farce has come in for a lot of criticism, including from one rather unexpected source: Muhammad Dahlan.

Maan News reported today that,

    If the American policy is to "waste time pretending we are in negotiations" as Israel continues to build settlements and claim Palestinian heritage sites, Dahlan said, there is no point to go ahead with the talks.

    "We have been sick of the occupation for years, and sick of negotiations since 2000," he said, referring to the start of the Second Intifada following civil unrest around a failure of the Oslo Accords.

Oh dear. It looks as if the project to rebuild Fateh's organizational integrity that was pursued with such fanfare last summer didn't do quite as well as hoped.




Comments
Please add your own comments that are courteous, fresh, helpful, and to the point. Be aware that comments might take a minute or two to post because of the extensive filtering we need to use. Comments that contain a number of links may be delayed so that I or my tech advisor can give approval for their publication. Generally this should not take too long. ~HC









Remember personal info?










Recent Posts on JWN
• Nothing to add (1)
• Obama, Biden cave to Netanyahu (14)
• Waskow's sad arguments against BDS (2)
• R&R (2)
• Avraham Burg, a prophetic voice for Jerusalem (2)
• New life for Israel's anti-occupation left? (1)
• Obama's Gitmo policy: Franz Kafka, meet the Star Chamber (5)
• Malley & Harling on M.E. regional dynamics (3)
• On CPR's 'Worldview' on Tuesday, March 9 (0)
• More on Turkey: Özel, Rosenberg (5)
• Syria once again at the regional pivot (1)
• As'ad AbuKhalil, the Mossad, and Israel's KoolAid (18)
• Tragic endgame for the U.S. in Iraq (7)
• Advancing to... 1949? (0)
• Prolonged conflict and pro-natalism (20)
• Home-library discoveries (0)
• Israel Ballet bombs (artistically) in DC (22)
• Iran "calling" Israel's nuclear-related blackmail? (9)
• Martin Indyk's 'conversion' (10)
• The ultimate in chutzpah?? (10)
• Leveretts on Israeli-Iranian 'proxy war' (2)
• Excellent BDS victory in Brussels! (6)
• Spy Wars heat up! (2)
• 'Chicago Hearing' on Israel and U.S. values, April 18 (11)
• Dan Halutz's 'recipe' for success... against Iran? (3)
• Hillary's war-drums on Iran; Russia unwilling? (6)
• What's been happening in Shu'afat Refugee Camp? (0)
• Tel Aviv municipality supports racist 'chastity' patrols (1)
•  Essays by HC in 'Boston Review', since 2001 (0)
• Fareed Zakaria calls it right on Iran, Israel (11)
• Turkish IHH foundation plans new siege-busting project for Gaza (4)
• More questions about Mossad's Dubai debacle (28)
• WaPo's hate propaganda against Syria (4)
• Blast from the CNI past (2)
• Israelis call for talks with Hamas (4)
• Far-right Israeli gov't cracks down-- on members of US Congress! (1)
• Jerusalem between two states and one (5)
• Hillary's contortions on Iran (26)
• My grandfather goes looking for his own grave (and other Maltese mysteries) (7)
• Malta: Notes from the conference, part 2 (8)
• More signs of Mitchell's sidelining (4)
• Malta: Some notes from the conference, tweeting, etc (2)
• In Malta, discussing Jerusalem (1)
• I'm back! (19)
• BBC's embarrassing ethnocentrism (5)
• Charlottesville's internet-speed glory (2)
• In Boston Review forum-- on Afghanistan (6)
• CNI study-tour blogging at FPFD (9)
• A Grave View of US-Iran Relations (22)
• Iran's Capital Idea (22)