Is this gnome running US Mideast diplomacy?


Posted by Helena Cobban
August 4, 2009 9:47 AM EST | Link
Filed in Obama presidency , Palestine 2009

It turns out there's a popular figure in some portions of US popular culture called "the underpants gnome."

The underpants gnome has a "business plan" that consists of three phases. Phase one is "Collect underpants". Phase three is "Profit." But neither the gnome nor anyone else can figure out what the Phase two is that bridges from phase one to phase three.

Joshua Foust at Registan has used the UG as a metaphor for various proposals that have been made to deploy more military-backed "Provincial Reconstruction Teams" into either Afghanistan or Pakistan. He is (imho rightly) very skeptical of the idea that PRTs can be a magic bullet to resolve the deepset problems of governance and security in either country.

But I think we've seen the underpants gnome phenomenon at work in Obama's Arab-Israeli "peace" diplomacy, as well:

    Phase One: Keep on repeating that you want to speedily solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict by establishing a Palestinian state; keep on publicly criticizing the Israeli government's settlement construction; send George Mitchell out to the region like a yo-yo, many times.

    Phase Two: ? ?

    Phase Three: Achieve the Palestinian-Israeli final peace agreement.

Anyway, if you haven't seen the underpants gnome video clip, do go see it. It's only 30 seconds.




Comments
Comment from... Craig, at August 4, 2009 11:58 AM:

I think you have finally found the true explanation of Obama's middle east policy. And I'm sure Dennis Ross is working very hard to keep that gnome employed, since as long as the gnome is on the job, there will be no real progress.

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)