Israelis, mainly peaceniks, Pt. 3: Moshe Ma'oz


Posted by Helena Cobban
March 29, 2009 11:50 AM EST | Link
Filed in Israel-2009

Moshe Ma’oz is a veteran Israeli peacenik and a retired prof of Middle East Studies at Hebrew University who has done a lot of great research and writing on Syria.  Jewish Israelis are often very wary of agreeing to come to meetings in East Jerusalem.  As Benny Morris once told me: “It’s simply because we don’t know our way around here; we come here so rarely.” Ma’oz, to his credit, was happy to come over to the little hotel I was staying in there—I think I’d told him about the attractions of its restaurant; plus, crucially, he seemed to know where it was.

But on March 3, as the time for our meeting approached even he was defeated by the horrible parking situation, so he called and asked if we could meet at the American Colony instead.

For those who don’t know it, the AC is named after a group of quixotic Presbyterian utopians from Chicago who made their way to Jerusalem in 1881 with the aim of setting up a utopian colony dedicated to various good works.  They attracted many participants from both the US and Sweden, and eventually ended up in a beautiful, courtyarded old home outside the Old City's walls to the north, in the neighborhood known as Sheikh Jarrah after a famous local mosque.  At some point, the colony had declined to the point that the remaining members of it decided to turn the beautiful old house and a couple of others the colony owned beside it into a hotel. One of the colony’s last surviving members/descendants, Val Vester, lived in a cool basement apartment there till her death a couple of years ago.

Back in the 1980s  before the hotel’s Swiss management company jacked up the prices quite inordinately, they used to always keep a few rooms at low rates for visiting journalists and researchers, and my husband and I often stayed there.  Sometimes we would go and visit with Mrs. Vester and hear all her great stories about the old days.

Also in the 1980s, the AC was one of the places where George Shultz or other visiting American dignitaries would visit Palestinian leaders like Faisal Husseini or Hanan Ashrawi. Those were “the good old days”—before the Israelis started to completely prohibit any Palestinian political activity in Jerusalem at all. (That came with Oslo.)

Anyway, if you can spring for the price of two cups of coffee, it’s still a pleasant place to sit and do an interview with someone. The internal courtyard is truly lovely—planted with orange trees, vines, and flowers.  But it was ways too cold for us to sit there, so I would plant myself and my interviewee in one of the lounges, instead.

When Ma’oz walked in, he was pretty depressed, but he expressed it in his usual friendly and half-joking (maybe?) way:

Helena, I am so depressed! Do you think Denmark has room for six million Jews? There is no future for us here! … Honestly, I am ashamed to be an Israeli.

The main message he wanted to convey was this:

Obama has to act! He has to work fast to build consensus around the two-state solution. He has to work strongly with those in Israel who still want the two-state solution who are still, on paper, a majority… He has to combat the gang around Bibi Netanyahu.

He grew very serious, saying he thought it was true—and very problematic-- that most of the Israelis who want what they call a two-state solution,

still don’t want to give up East Jerusalem or the Jordan Valley—and without having East Jerusalem as the capital of an independent Palestinian state there will be no peace with the Arab and Muslim worlds.

“Jerusalem is the key!” he said, a number of times.

He said that one of the main things preventing Jewish Israelis from accepting the idea of a Palestinian state was the fear that Hamas might take over this state,

and then Hamas would threaten the whole country, including Lod [Ben Gurion] airport.

I can understand that fear. But the Palestinian state could be demilitarized: they are ready for this.

I asked if he thought it would be possible for any Israeli government to even consider trying to evacuate the nearly 500,000 settlers who are now in the West Bank (including east Jerusalem).

He said,

Some people say it could lead to civil war. And it’s true that in the IDF’s combat units you now have a growing number of religious officers.

We need good leadership in Israel!  In the context of a peace agreement, we can do a one-for-one land swap with the Palestinian state, and that would bring the areas holding 80% of the settlers into  Israel. You’d have to give the rest the opportunity to stay where they are under Palestinian sovereignty.

But don’t even dream of dismantling the settlements of East Jerusalem, the ones that they call neighborhoods.

… You know, the majority of Israelis who favor a two-state solution do so because they hate Palestinians, not because they love them.

He was completely clear that the ongoing building of new settlements has to stop:

Those settlements at Ariel and in and around Hebron—what on earth are they doing so deep in to the Palestinian areas?

He recalled that after the 1994 massacre in the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron, when the Kahanist settler activist Baruch Goldstein used his automatic weapon to slaughter 29 Muslim Hebronites who were praying there, he had been one of those specialists who had urged prime minister Rabin to take that opportunity to pull all the Jewish settlers out of downtown Hebron. “But he listened to Ehud Sprinzak instead,” he said dolefully. “Imagine how much easier the Hebron situation would be if we didn’t have all those settlers there now.”



Comments
Comment from... Joshua, at March 29, 2009 02:11 PM:

Evacuating Hebron will have to happen, and although I wont say it would be "easy" it can be done.

Gaza was completely evacuated. And Israel recently evacuated one of the more contentious spots in Hebron without incident. The settlers darkly spoke of the "price tag" doctrine, but they've done nothing since.

The problem is that recent history has shown that when Israel removes residents from territories, that does NOT lead to peace.

Your colleague's description of Israeli fear is well taken. I saw a panel a few months ago where Martin Kramer and Shibley Telhami were speaking about various issues, including of course Israel/Palestine. It was Telhami, mind you, who said that Israeli, Palestinian, American, and Jordanian intelligence all have come to the same conclusion. That the ONLY thing preventing a Hamas takeover of the West Bank is the presence of the IDF. So obviously "end the occupation" isn't the answer, at least not by itself.

Finally, there will be no need to remove all settlers. There is no mandating that the armistice lines of 1948 become the final borders, and they can be negotiated and adjusted. Large settlements close to the former armistice line can easily be incorporated into Israel. "Inadmissibility of territory acquired by force," which some people cite as some sort of ritualistic incantation does not mean that former armistice lines become boundaries, and does not mean that parties cannot reach negotiated agreements in good faith.

Comment from... Don Bacon, at March 29, 2009 03:35 PM:

“Jerusalem is the key!” he said, a number of times.

Let's call on Tom Clancy. In "The Sum of All Fears" Israel partially cedes sovereignty over Jerusalem to the Vatican and Saudi Arabia, and the city becomes a UN protectorate policed by Swiss Guards. Residents of Jerusalem can choose between either Vatican, Israeli or Islamic judicial law.

Comment from... bevin, at March 29, 2009 05:35 PM:

The fact that the IDF is the only force preventing Hamas from running the West Bank suggests that, despite Israel and its allies spending millions of US dollars on puppet forces, and despite ruthless campaigns of detention, assassination and other forms of terrorism, to ensure otherwise, Hamas would still be the choice of the Palestinian people.

This, it should not be necessary to point out, is not a justification for the IDF operations in the West Bank. It is an indication that they should, in accordance with the Oslo agreements, leave.

As to the settlements in the West Bank-all illegal, all defying the only authority which legitimates Israel existence, the UN- they are designed specifically to prevent Palestinians from controlling the territory. They must be removed, unless their inhabitants can come to an agreement with the Palestinians to live, with full rights of citizenship including religious toleration, in a Palestinian state.

The notion that people carry extra territoriality with them into other lands- that I could, by settling in Virginia, legitimately place myself under the protection of the Canadian government and defy the USA- is nonsensical. And racist.

Finally, Joshua, there is the question, which cannot be dismissed or evaded, of the repatriation of those driven out of their villages and homes since 1948. They and their descendants living under the feeble protection of the UN and international law, must not be denied justice.

In many ways the Israeli fascist parties are more realistic about peace than the political swamp to their left-they understand that there can be no peace without justice. So they don't pretend that the sanctification, by a weakened and barely authentic representative of the victims, of a surrender will ever pass muster in the real world (I say nothing of the fora inhabited by logic choppers and casuists)as a binding treaty of peace.

The questions would appear to be: when and how will the position of the Palestinians be elevated to one of military parity with Israel? Will this happen by Israel's allies falling away? By opinion moving decisively in the Palestinians' favour? Or by both.

Comment from... John Francis Lee, at March 29, 2009 09:47 PM:

The saga of the American Colony sounds like the saga of the American missionaries in Hawaai. Ended up owning the place "by mistake".

Obama has to act! He has to work fast to build consensus around the two-state solution. He has to work strongly with those in Israel who still want the two-state solution who are sill, on paper, a majority… He has to combat the gang around Bibi Netanyahu.

I think there is zero chance of that happening. The gang around Netanyahu is the same gang around Barack Obama. Maybe your prayers will be answered Helena. I just don't see how.

Your man Moshe Ma’oz seems to have read the the proposal of the ten wise people you linked the other day. Or to have written it.

Comment from... Scott Benson, at March 30, 2009 12:14 PM:

Any relation to the anti-Semitic British foreign minister Ernest Bevin?

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)