Arab League war crimes investigators in Gaza


Posted by Helena Cobban
February 27, 2009 1:48 AM EST | Link
Filed in Gaza08-09

The Arab League has shown a surprising burst of initiative and has been deploying a fact-finding mission to Gaza to investigate Israeli war crimes, according to this news release from the Gaza-based Palestinian Center for Human Rights.

The news release tells us that the mission started its work February 22 and will wrap it up today. PCHR has hosted the mission during its time in the field.

The members of the missions are:

    John Dughard, Former UN Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories; Finn Lenghjem, a judge and legal expert; Paul De Waart, an international legal expert; Gonzalo Boye, a lawyer and representative of PCHR in Spanish courts; Raeleene Sharp, an international lawyer; and Francisco Corte Real, an expert in forensic medicine. The mission is also accompanied by 3 members of the secretariat general of the League of Arab Nations: Radwan Ben Khader, Legal Advisor of the Secretary General; 'Aliaa Al-Ghussain, Director of Palestinian Affairs Department; and Ilham al-Shajani, First Secretary of Demography and Immigration Policies Department.
The heavy representation of Spanish experts in the team is not surprising, considering that the Spanish courts claim "universal jurisdiction" for a range of war crimes and other atrocities-- as Pinochet earlier learned to his dismay-- and that the National Court of Spain anyway has a case outstanding against seven former senior Israeli military officials in connection with the IAF's 2002 dropping of a 2,000-pound bomb on the home of Salah Shehadeh in Gaza, an act that killed 17 civilians along with Shehadeh, injured 70 other civilians, and completely destroyed eleven homes.

So who knows how the Arab League or prosecutors in Spain or elsewhere might end up using the report of this fact-finding commission?



Comments
Comment from... N. Friedman, at February 27, 2009 09:32 AM:

Perhaps, they will also investigate Hamas war crimes. That should not be hard, because the group's basic strategy relies primarily on war crimes.

Comment from... John Molina, at February 27, 2009 01:57 PM:

It's a case of you give us your incediary bombs and will give you our Katyusha rockets. Which would you prefer, Mr Friedman, hmm?

Comment from... N. Friedman, at February 27, 2009 01:59 PM:

John,

I prefer that the dispute be settled and that no one commit war crimes.

Comment from... Don Bacon, at February 27, 2009 07:21 PM:

Cheeez, the war crime investigators aren't going to Iraq also, are they? I suspect that the US embassies in Arab countries are frantically trying to stop this sort of thing before it gets out of control. I mean, Israeli war crimes pale in comparison to US ones.

Comment from... John Francis Lee, at February 27, 2009 09:36 PM:

During the [Nuremberg] trial, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

The US/UK/Israeli Axis is the aggressor in the Middle East. Therefore the US, the UK, and Israel are the Supreme International Criminals.

Unless and until the Anglo-American-Israeli War Crime Tribunals are held and the guilty punished, in broad daylight on daytime TV, they will continue with their aggressions until they exhaust their and the world's resources.

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)