Syria's position strengthening internationally, regionally


Posted by Helena Cobban
February 16, 2009 5:28 AM EST | Link
Filed in Gaza08-09 , Syria

Syria's place in the world community-- which the ideologues in the Bush White House did so much to attack and delegitimize-- has been strengthening noticeably in the past few days/weeks.

Later this week, Sen. John Kerry, the new chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will visit Syria. Ahead of the visit, he said the Obama administration is eager to talk to Syria. The US has not had an ambassador there since 2005, though it does have an embassy.

From a domestic US perspective, it is extremely important that this rapprochement win solid support in both houses of Congress, since under pressure from the pro-Israel lobby-- as well as the Bush administration-- Congress has itself been another major driver of the "isolate and attack Syria" campaign.

At a regional level, Syria has won some new influence, too. Yesterday, the head of Saudi Arabia's intelligence service, Prince Muqrin bin Abdul-Aziz, visited Syria where he met President Bashar al-Asad and conveyed from King Abdullah (his older half-brother), a message about "bilateral ties and the importance of consultation and coordination between the two sides", according to the Syrian official news agency.

A rapprochement between Syria and Saudi Arabia-- which have been at loggerheads since the assassination of former Lebanese PM Rafiq Hariri in February 2005-- would be extremely significant for the politics of the entire region.

Western spinmeisters and MSM have made a huge point about the depth and alleged intractability of the rift between the alleged "moderates" and "extremists" in the Arab world, a rift that seemed particularly evident during the most recent Gaza crisis.

But most western commentators often have little idea about the depth and complexity of the regional dynamics that continue to underlie regional-- and in particular, inter-Arab-- relations. I find it interesting that these two regimes, in particular, now apparently see it in their interest to move towards some degree of rapprochement.

The political fallout from the Gaza crisis continues. Egypt has been, I think, somewhat strengthened in its role in the region-- as I wrote last week. But so, too, has Syria. So the whole regional system remains dynamic, and certainly not easily reducible to some form of a zero-sum "moderates versus extremists" template.



Comments
Comment from... bb, at February 16, 2009 05:42 PM:

???????????

If Hamas agrees to re-submit to the PA under a unity government headed by Salaam Fayad then it would be nothing less than a major defeat for Hamas? It would mean the Oslo rejectionists had caved in to the PA recognition of Israel. Such an outcome would be astounding, but it would certainly be in line with Obama's public diplomacy so far - the continuation of the Bush/Rice position.

In all this sudden enthusiasm for Egypt, it should not be forgotten that it was Egypt who trained the PA security forces blamed for preciptating the Hamas military coup.

Comment from... ALEDLBI, at February 18, 2009 06:09 AM:

Damaskus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!scönste Stadt in der Welt!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment from... Shirin, at February 19, 2009 03:28 AM:

If one is forced to use a moderates versus extremists paradigm here, it is clearly the Saudis who are the extremists and the Syrians who are the moderates, and not vice versa. But of course this is not the American version of reality, it is the real world version of reality.

Comment from... Helena, at February 20, 2009 03:29 PM:

Excellent point, Shirin. One worth making over and over and over... Maybe one day it'll sink in?

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)