Recruiting for the Enemy


Posted by Don Bacon
December 7, 2008 2:19 PM EST | Link
Filed in Afghanistan , Guantanamo , Iraq-2008-q4 , Military occupations , US military

The US occupation forces in Iraq have, from the beginning of the occupation more than five years ago, engaged in the arbitrary imprisonment ("detaining") of Iraqi citizens. As one former US soldier testified: "I witnessed and participated in countless massive operations led by American commanders whose metrics for success were numbers of detainees apprehended."--Louis Montalvan

If you were a YSM (young Sunni male) found in a night-time US military sweep through Iraqi neighborhoods you stood an excellent chance of being zip-tied, thrown into the back of a truck and taken downtown. "Most of the people they detain are innocent," said Iraqi Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi.

This has resulted in US prison populations in Iraq of nearly 20,000 prisoners, with another 26,000 being held by our Iraqi surrogates.

As Afghanistan heats up, more Afghan citizens are being arbitrarily arrested and held in prison. In August construction began on a new facility for as many as 1,100 detainees and now the US Military has initiated an inquiry into possible detainee abuse

All of this, of course, is in direct violation of the Geneva Convention which calls for the military to be responsible for the welfare of citizens in a war zone or occupied territory.
Protected civilians MUST be:


    - Treated humanely at all times and protected against acts or threats of violence, insults and public curiosity.
    - Entitled to respect for their honour, family rights, religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs.

A much lesser number of prisoners, in the hundreds, have been held by the US military in Cuba. But in June the Supreme Court handed its third consecutive rebuff to the Bush administration’s handling of the detainees at Guantánamo Bay, ruling 5 to 4 that the prisoners there have a constitutional right to go to federal court to challenge their continued detention. The finding, Boumediene v. Bush, (pdf) reversed and remanded a refusal of the DC Circuit Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus to Gitmo internees.

Barack Obama has promised to close the internment facility in Cuba. We'll see.

There has been no such court finding for the unfortunates in Iraq, Afghanistan and who knows where else. However, in Iraq, the new SOFA pact has called for the release of all US-held prisoners. Perhaps it will happen.

There are two views of what these people might do if the are released, and neither is good.

The military view: "We are concerned that we will most likely release dangerous detainees back into the communities of Iraq who have directly contributed to the deaths of not only Iraqi and Coalition Forces, but countless numbers of civilians," said Major Neal Fisher, spokesman for U.S. detainee operations.

The human rights view: "Why are they detained if they don't have adequate evidence against them?" asked Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty International's Middle East and North Africa Programme. And will people who were arbitrarily held in cages and possibly tortured just forgive and forget when they are released? Would you?

“Unsurprisingly, someone who’s been deprived of their liberties for months and years without even a hint of due process … of course they’re going to be angry,” said Joseph Logan of Human Rights Watch, who recently spent time in the country researching the Iraqi justice system. “As the Americans found in 2003, the enemies you create are going to be there down the road. I think there is definitely political impact down the road from this.”

Either way, it's recruiting for the enemy.
---
Don Bacon is a retired army officer who founded the Smedley Butler Society several years ago because, as General Butler wrote, war is a racket.



Comments
Comment from... sergi, at December 8, 2008 10:21 AM:

Geneva Convention
Politician who asemble and ratify Geneva Convention had pompeous vission but NO idea or experience of situation in war zones,not sure if teritories ocupied by foreign forces could be classified as WZ.
Protection of civilians incl. women/children in any conflict should be paramout to any General/Comander with or without Geneva Convention.
I am just wondering if anyone in Israeli Government ever heard about Geneva Convention and if did anyone read it?

Comment from... Abdelhafid Dib, at December 8, 2008 10:47 AM:

Hello Don,

Unfortunately, all these crimes are done in the name of American citizen.The American taxpayer who pays the bill for this dirty war which reached more than six trillion dollars during since 2001, at least,he is morally,responsible for it.
Therefore, the common US citizen who covers all these wars expenses under the slogan " war anti-terror" that makes American values at stake,should be revised by new American administration .

Hafid

Comment from... Helena, at December 8, 2008 11:10 AM:

Hey, Don. Thanks for these great posts. This incarceration story is an important sub-theme in all late-colonial, last ditch efforts at counter-"insurgency".

I am in a place in Princeton, NJ with extremely hard-to-access internet, so I'm particularly grateful you're getting good content up here!

Comment from... Don Bacon, at December 8, 2008 11:40 AM:

It sounds like Helena is being held hostage by that Woodrow Wilson crowd in Princeton, people, and probably being subjected to Ann-Marie Slaughter's pitch for a Council of Democracies to end-run the United Nations. This calls for action!

Now here's what we do: Shirin and Frank, you cover me while I move through that wood-line . . .

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)