Israel attacks Gaza, demonstrates it is still the 'occupying power'


Posted by Helena Cobban
November 19, 2008 10:10 AM EST | Link
Filed in Military occupations , Palestine 2008

The Israeli military has sent ground forces deep into Gaza over the past two weeks, and has killed 17 Palestinians, and wounded uncounted others. In what even longtime Israeli flack Ron Ben-Yishai admits are retaliatory attacks, Palestinian rocketeers from Gaza have wounded an unknown number -- presumed small-- of residents of southern Israel, but killed none. This (highly asymmetrical) exchange of attacks has spread fear on both sides of the international border between Gaza and Israel.

In addition, the Israeli government recently tightened yet further the siege it has maintained around Gaza since the election nearly three years ago of a Hamas-dominated parliament in Gaza and the West Bank. The siege has contributed to the deaths of more than 200 Gaza Palestinians and has prevented the other 1.5 million residents of the Strip from leading anything like a normal life.

This BBC report tells us that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged Israeli PM Olmert in a recent phone call to lift the siege.

Yesterday, the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights, Judge Navanethem Pillay, issued a hard-hitting statement calling for an immediate end to the blockade of Gaza. It said:

    "By function of this blockade, 1.5 million Palestinian men, women and children have been forcibly deprived of their most basic human rights for months... This is in direct contravention of international human rights and humanitarian law. It must end now."
Here in the United States, apologists for the Israeli government have argued since 2005 that Israel "ended the occupation of the Gaza Strip" that year, and that therefore since then it has borne no continuing responsibility for the welfare of the Strip's residents such as is required of any "foreign military occupying power" under the Fourth Geneva Convention.

But since 2005, Israel has continued to maintain tight control over all avenues and channels through which the Gazans might have contact with the outside world, and it has maintained it still has a "right" to intervene militarily in Gaza whenever it chooses.

Those two aspects of Israel's policy put the lie to its claim that it has "ended" the military occupation of the Gaza Strip that it has, actually, maintained continuously since June of 1967.

If Israel were not, in fact, the military occupier of this territory then either the blockade it has maintained around it or the repeated military actions it has mounted against it would be considered under international law as overt acts of war that would allow the legitimate (indigenous) government of Gaza to request any and all forms of international military aid to counter and suppress those hostile acts.

But few actors in the international community believe that the democratically elected administration in Gaza has this right. Indeed, the BBC report on the Gaza situation quotes an un-named an Israeli official as describing Israel's latest ground-force incursion into Gaza as "a routine operation", i.e. not an act of war as such.

Routine???

The people of Gaza, the West Bank, and Golan have had to live under the vagaries, aggressions, harsh repression, and downright dispossession that have marked Israel's military occupation rule of these territories for 41.5 years now. It is time for all these military occupations to end.

Why, even the United States' military occupation rule over Iraq is now scheduled to end at the end of 2011, after lasting less than eight years! How can the international community allow Israel's rapacious and inhumane occupations to continue?



Comments
Comment from... Doug, at November 19, 2008 02:38 PM:

" How can the international community allow Israel's rapacious and inhumane occupations to continue? "

In Wikipedia's entry under 'List of United Nations Resolutions concerning Israel', the line:

'The United States has used its veto power to prevent resolutions concerning Israel from passing through the Security Council on 42 occasions since 1970'

... gives an indication I think as to why the International Community is struggling over resolving this issue.

Israel morphed very quickly into an arm of the US Imperial Adventure - of that I personally have no doubt.

It's those powerful forces of Imperialism that have taken root in the US, (not your average American), that support and even egg on the 'rapacious and inhumane occupations'

Israel is able to exist and prosper because its an extension of US Imperial power - and of course its a mutually agreeable arrangement! (They are even learning how to wag the dog sometimes! - which is very very scary)


Comment from... Jason Wright, at December 5, 2008 02:01 AM:

This article has been referenced in "U.S. Military Assistance to Israel: In Need of Scrutiny" at http://www.politicsarguments.com/?p=142

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)