Obama and Maliki, face to face


Posted by Helena Cobban
July 21, 2008 9:23 AM EST | Link
Filed in Iraq-2008-q3 , US election 2008

They met today in the Green Zone.

That Reuters report has no further details. But it notes that Obama,

    has also welcomed a suggestion by Maliki that a timetable be set for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq.
So now, the US is in a particularly 21st-century kind of situation in Iraq. Not only is our government able to influence Iraqi politics, but the Iraqi government understands that it can influence ours. And equally importantly, beyond the realms of government, non-governmental individuals and citizen groups in each country have a voice in the global discourse and can communicate with each other as well as with their own governments. (As I noted, e.g., here.)

Governments can no longer monopolize border-crossing discussions of border-crossing issues.

Memo to George W. Bush and all other military adventurists: We are no longer in the 19th century! No nation, western or other, can any longer undertake military adventures outside its own borders and count on covering up the huge human and other costs of that adventure!

Deal with it. Start treating the Iraqis and all their neighbors as equal humans, equal nations, and start the negotiations required to exit the Iraqi sinkhole in a safe and sustainable manner as soon as possible.



Comments
Comment from... Gloomy Gus, at July 22, 2008 01:36 PM:

Fly At Once. All Is Discovered.

"Obama's 'visit is for his private benefit, to win the election race,' said Ali Ahmed Abbas, 35. 'I don't expect any good from this, because we have heard from other American politicians, and we didn't see any difference in their policy towards Iraq.' "

Happy days.

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)