Afghanistan's opposition as a peasant-based insurgency, by Bob Spencer


Posted by Helena Cobban
July 14, 2008 2:36 PM EST | Link
Filed in Afghanistan

Long-time JWN commenter Bob Spencer sent me the text of a thought-provoking small essay he has written, that takes as its starting point that the opposition movement in Afghanistan can best be considered as similar to most or all other peasant-based insurgencies.

I applaud this intentional attempt to get beyond (or quite out of) the discourse of "fighting terror" and to contextualize what's happening in Afghanistan.

Here's how Bob's essay starts:

    In a peasant-based insurgency, the side that is least politically effective is the side that will escalate the violence. Also, the side that is least politically effective will most often lose the conflict.
Not wanting to buy (or in this instance, publish) any pigs-in-pokes, I asked Bob to tell us a little about himself. Here's what he wrote:
    My background is somewhat unorthodox. I guess you can say that I have spent a lifetime writing and managing foundation and government human development grants. At the same time, I have spent most of my adult life studying about political development and insurgencies.

    If anyone asks for any details---and probably, nobody will; here’s the scoop.

    I worked in Viet Nam for four years during the war. I worked in refugee camps and village development. I was in the most intense part of the country and found myself backing into Vietnamese politics. Several of the most highly skilled Vietnamese political operators had the patience to teach me every day about Vietnamese politics. They included a prominent monk, the highest level spies, a highly admired and effective community organizer, and good civil servants. Life became pretty exciting and my life often depended upon my understanding of Vietnamese politics, so I tended to be as good a student as I could.

    I don’t know if it is good or bad, but much of my motivation came from anger and sadness at what I saw.

So, now you can go read his thoughts on Afghanistan here.

Please note that, as nearly all editors do, I put the headline onto the piece. Also note that, though I am happy to publish it because I think it pushes the discussion of what-all is happening in Afghanistan forward in helpful ways, still I don't agree with everything Bob writes. Or rather, I think there are a couple of important questions that he fails to ask about the US-NATO project in Afghanistan.

But I don't want to prejudice the discussion by bringing up those questions now. I invite readers to go read Bob's piece and comment on them here.

Thanks for honoring JWN with your essay, Bob.



Comments
Comment from... Robert Consoli, at July 17, 2008 07:39 PM:

Loved the casual endorsement of child labor! (follow the links).

Recent Posts on JWN
• The Color of Iran's Elections (15)
• George Mitchell is doing what?? (24)
• Does Obama understand Israel's war goal in Iran? (81)
• Newsweek: "Everything you know about Iran is Wrong" (16)
• Closing Gitmo: The Abe Lincoln solution (18)
• Iran Politics: It's the foreign policy, stupid. (12)
• IPS piece on Turkey's role in region, world (35)
• Transit systems, Turkey (2)
• More on 'natural growth' in settlements (1)
• Thinking on Iran decision-making (9)
• Why Israel's 'natural growth' claim is dishonest: Four reasons (3)
• Abbas losing support from Fateh (10)
• Open Thread, Istanbul, London (16)
• My IPS piece on Netanyahu's big meeting with Obama (23)
• Uzi Arad in Washington (9)
• Uzi Arad and other aspects of Netanyahu's Washington visit (33)
• After Hamas's Hudna, what? (9)
• Dayton on his Palestinian army's prospects (9)
• An informed view of Hamas policy (14)
• J. Cook on the Pope in Nazareth (10)
• Meshaal on the Palestinian state alongside Israel; Nunu on the tahdi'eh (0)
• Meshaal: the longer NYT text, and a question about Haaretz (4)
• Palestine/Bantustans (3)
• On Qatar and Sheikha Mozah (11)
• Palestine: The archipelago 'map', spaciocide, etc. (14)
• My piece in The Nation on Hamas (2)
• Obama and Israel's nukes (8)
• Advancing Security and Opportunity -- US Style (5)
• White House (still) guiding Middle East policy (13)
• Mondoweiss tweets AIPAC (10)
• US MSM and Latin America (5)
• NYT interviews Meshaal (5)
• Discussing Hamas with Allister Sparks (41)
• New reports on press and other freedoms (7)
• Some notes from UNESCO klatch, Doha (9)
• Another Scary Terror Report (11)
• The Year of the Ox II (7)
• IPS piece on Lebanon (9)
• Hariri court orders generals' release; case in disarray (6)
• Obama opens timid discussion with Congress on Hamas (6)
• Netanyahu and the 'Palestinian state' card (12)
• China Hand on the bleak prospects for the US in Afghanistan (4)
• 'Sensitive' developments in Saudi Arabia? Succession-related? (5)
• Videos from the recent Georgetown University CCAS conference (0)
• More dishonest argumentation from the WaPo's Hoagland (12)
• Ahmadinejad: "Whatever decision they (Palestininians) take is fine with us" (13)
• Destruction of mosques in Israel after 1948 (12)
• IPS piece on coming Obama-Netanyahu spat (27)
• On bank governance: A modest proposal (11)
• Sort of catching up here (5)