Bloggingheads gender update


Posted by Helena Cobban
July 14, 2008 1:07 PM EST | Link
Filed in Annapolis and after

I just checked the main page of their website. They now have one woman among the 20 contributors featured on the page.

Not good enough at all, guys.

Especially when, down on the right sidebar we have this little bit of icky laddishness:

    What do you call two naked women painted to look like cows? On BhTV, we call it "playful."
Ohmigod. So it is indeed true. For women to get any attention at this site we need to take off our clothes and have our bodies laughed at?

Actually, I find the "cow" imagery there really disturbing, as well as the nakedness.

And this is "cutting edge"? And this is the "New America" that Robert Wright's sponsors at the New America Foundation are trying to build?

Pathetic.



Comments
Comment from... azazel, at July 14, 2008 01:30 PM:

In case you're unaware of the context for the article about women painted as cows, it has to do with the controversy over Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski's web site.

Upon pulling up a list of all vlogs uploaded to BH in the past 30 days, I'd say there are enough by women to make it highly unusual that only one is featured on the front page. They may have a good reason (why don't you ask them?) but there's a case to answer.

Comment from... Helena, at July 14, 2008 01:34 PM:

I understand the "context". That doesn't make the editorial comment on the sidebar there any the less offensive.

Also, yes, maybe having one female among the 20 contributors featured on the front page there is exceptional. All over the weekend there were NONE.

Comment from... vadim, at July 14, 2008 05:05 PM:

Why don't you complain to managing editor Brenda Talbot, since she's the "lad" responsible for picking BHTV features?

Recent Posts on JWN
• Realism, war, and pacifism (3)
• Palin's performance: Insulting and very scary (28)
• September 11 and the war in Afghanistan (6)
• US's global dominance 'Reduced': It's nearly official! (1)
• JWN redesign update #1 (2)
• Oliver North??? (5)
• J. Diehl criticizing Saakashvili (3)
• Peres warns against attacking Iran (0)
• Georgia-Hizbullah: Dept. of Delicious Ironies (2)
• US probing Russian Red Lines in Georgia (0)
• Women discuss Sarah Palin (26)
• New vistas-- personal, and blog-related (12)
• The longterm status of Georgia: Challenges ahead (20)
• Text of the draft Iraq-US SOFA (10)
• HRW revising its Russian cluster bomb accusations (11)
• International tensions and the US election (9)
• Iraq: Another Quaker in the 'Red Zone' (3)
• HRW's flawed 'Research' on Georgian cluster bombs (20)
• More on China in Iraq (12)
• Post on China in US occupied zones-- at Japan Focus (0)
• Palin and the 3 a.m. phone call (39)
• China and Iraq (4)
• Egyptian delegation to break Gaza siege (2)
• Waiting for Gustav (5)
• Italy gives Libya $$ compensation for colonial rule (17)
• China buys in to Iraqi, Afghan end-games (15)
• "Resolution": Palin's goal in Iraq (8)
• China's way of 'Emerging' (6)
• A note on US politics (6)
• Conway does a Dannatt (sort of) (7)
• China gets Iraq oil deal (6)
• Rest-of-world saving US from recession? (5)
• Russia and the world (12)
• Milanovic: From Global Trade to Global War (5)
• The return of geography (3)
• Still no US-Iraq security agreement (yawn) (2)
• Iraq-US: More disagreement than 'Agreement' (23)
• NATO's supply lines in Afghanistan (27)
• My CSM piece on the big-picture implications of Georgia (21)
• Mahbubani on western hypocrisy, etc. (5)
• Condi in Baghdad: YES on a timetable (aspirational) (8)
• More on NATO, etc. (14)
• NATO's crisis (8)
• And another thing about Finland (23)
• Where in the world is... Ban Ki-Moon? (22)
• Russian military assessment: New arms race? (26)
• And now for a little audio (0)
• Yglesias nails McCain (4)
• Sarkozy's ceasefire, Georgia's future (22)
• Georgia crisis and the shifting global balance (0)