Bloggingheads gender update


Posted by Helena Cobban
July 14, 2008 1:07 PM EST | Link
Filed in Annapolis and after

I just checked the main page of their website. They now have one woman among the 20 contributors featured on the page.

Not good enough at all, guys.

Especially when, down on the right sidebar we have this little bit of icky laddishness:

    What do you call two naked women painted to look like cows? On BhTV, we call it "playful."
Ohmigod. So it is indeed true. For women to get any attention at this site we need to take off our clothes and have our bodies laughed at?

Actually, I find the "cow" imagery there really disturbing, as well as the nakedness.

And this is "cutting edge"? And this is the "New America" that Robert Wright's sponsors at the New America Foundation are trying to build?

Pathetic.



Comments
Comment from... azazel, at July 14, 2008 01:30 PM:

In case you're unaware of the context for the article about women painted as cows, it has to do with the controversy over Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski's web site.

Upon pulling up a list of all vlogs uploaded to BH in the past 30 days, I'd say there are enough by women to make it highly unusual that only one is featured on the front page. They may have a good reason (why don't you ask them?) but there's a case to answer.

Comment from... Helena, at July 14, 2008 01:34 PM:

I understand the "context". That doesn't make the editorial comment on the sidebar there any the less offensive.

Also, yes, maybe having one female among the 20 contributors featured on the front page there is exceptional. All over the weekend there were NONE.

Comment from... vadim, at July 14, 2008 05:05 PM:

Why don't you complain to managing editor Brenda Talbot, since she's the "lad" responsible for picking BHTV features?

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)