Arlington Memorial Disgrace


Posted by Scott Harrop
July 14, 2008 7:53 AM EST | Link
Filed in Iraq 2003 thru June 2005

Today's NYTimes editorial, Witnessing the War Dead, From Afar tears rather deeply at me (sh). No, I've never been a fan of this Iraq war and occupation. Alas, I have a son soon enough on his way there.

So excuse me if I don't quite contain my angst at yet another effort to shroud the costs of the Iraq war -- by keeping the media far away from funeral ceremonies at Arlington Cemetery.

The muting of bad war news, which started at the Pentagon, is now an issue as well at Arlington National Cemetery. A public affairs director at the cemetery was recently fired after complaining that rules were tightened to isolate the media 50 yards away — well beyond the point at which news organizations could hear, never mind photograph or videotape, burial ceremonies.

I'm all for decorum, respect, honor, etc. The Pentagon says it is following the wishes of the families. But what of those families who do wish to share their moment of supreme trial? Are they now being coached to stay anonymous, to treat the media, to treat their fellow citizens as "the enemy?" Sure looks that way.

If I'm ever, heaven forbid, faced with this cup, I say in advance....

Dear God, I can't....

But I can say this. Not all of the media will be welcome. To Michael R. Gordon, the "next Judith Miller," who continues his under-handed campaign to drum up public sentiment for another war, this time with Iran.... he and his ilk would not be welcome.



Comments
Comment from... Helena, at July 14, 2008 10:49 AM:

Scott, thanks for writing about this outrage. (And so effectively, too.)

Regarding your son, I feel a bit bad about having referred to the country he's about to be deployed to as a "sitting duck abbatoir." And I'm really sorry if that added to the burdens of hurt and concern that I'm sure you're already feeling about his deployment.

My deepest hope regarding all the US service members in Iraq is that they can all exit the country and return to their homes and loved ones still whole in body and soul-- and that they can do so very soon indeed. I imagine that is your hope, too. I really admire your commitment to the cause of de-escalation and conflict termination in the whole of the Persian Gulf region-- and, too, your readiness to speak out even about your keenest personal fears regarding your son's fate.

God with him and with everyone else in the battle zone. May they all emerge unharmed, if at all possible.

Comment from... Salah, at July 17, 2008 05:23 AM:

The Pentagon says it is following the wishes of the families. But what of those families who do wish to share their moment of supreme trial?

Hamm, but MSM full of dead Iraqi bodies with all the disgusting images from Iraq about Iraqis, did US media have following the wishes of Iraqi nation and Iraqi families?

But this is the heroes who make their wars legal call it the war of freedom but hiding their head in the sand for their fraud news about their loses by telling they following the wishes of the families.

Comment from... Salah, at July 17, 2008 05:34 AM:

"As you leave the visitor's center one of the first signs you see is a plain white notice which bears the following message:"

Our nation's most sacred shrine? More than, say, Independence Hall? Or the Statue of Liberty? The word shrine implies something religious or spiritual, in the sense that a shrine is a place where devotees worship the person, thing, or concept memorialized therein. A shrine also tends to be a concrete object, a public edifice whose significance may change over time. As old people and perspectives die and new ones take their place,
Recent Posts on JWN
• The Color of Iran's Elections (15)
• George Mitchell is doing what?? (24)
• Does Obama understand Israel's war goal in Iran? (81)
• Newsweek: "Everything you know about Iran is Wrong" (16)
• Closing Gitmo: The Abe Lincoln solution (18)
• Iran Politics: It's the foreign policy, stupid. (12)
• IPS piece on Turkey's role in region, world (35)
• Transit systems, Turkey (2)
• More on 'natural growth' in settlements (1)
• Thinking on Iran decision-making (9)
• Why Israel's 'natural growth' claim is dishonest: Four reasons (3)
• Abbas losing support from Fateh (10)
• Open Thread, Istanbul, London (16)
• My IPS piece on Netanyahu's big meeting with Obama (23)
• Uzi Arad in Washington (9)
• Uzi Arad and other aspects of Netanyahu's Washington visit (33)
• After Hamas's Hudna, what? (9)
• Dayton on his Palestinian army's prospects (9)
• An informed view of Hamas policy (14)
• J. Cook on the Pope in Nazareth (10)
• Meshaal on the Palestinian state alongside Israel; Nunu on the tahdi'eh (0)
• Meshaal: the longer NYT text, and a question about Haaretz (4)
• Palestine/Bantustans (3)
• On Qatar and Sheikha Mozah (11)
• Palestine: The archipelago 'map', spaciocide, etc. (14)
• My piece in The Nation on Hamas (2)
• Obama and Israel's nukes (8)
• Advancing Security and Opportunity -- US Style (5)
• White House (still) guiding Middle East policy (13)
• Mondoweiss tweets AIPAC (10)
• US MSM and Latin America (5)
• NYT interviews Meshaal (5)
• Discussing Hamas with Allister Sparks (41)
• New reports on press and other freedoms (7)
• Some notes from UNESCO klatch, Doha (9)
• Another Scary Terror Report (11)
• The Year of the Ox II (7)
• IPS piece on Lebanon (9)
• Hariri court orders generals' release; case in disarray (6)
• Obama opens timid discussion with Congress on Hamas (6)
• Netanyahu and the 'Palestinian state' card (12)
• China Hand on the bleak prospects for the US in Afghanistan (4)
• 'Sensitive' developments in Saudi Arabia? Succession-related? (5)
• Videos from the recent Georgetown University CCAS conference (0)
• More dishonest argumentation from the WaPo's Hoagland (12)
• Ahmadinejad: "Whatever decision they (Palestininians) take is fine with us" (13)
• Destruction of mosques in Israel after 1948 (12)
• IPS piece on coming Obama-Netanyahu spat (27)
• On bank governance: A modest proposal (11)
• Sort of catching up here (5)