Can the Bushites honestly be THIS crazy??


Posted by Helena Cobban
May 10, 2008 3:32 PM EST | Link
Filed in Iran

Philip Giraldi of American (Paleo-)Conservative wrote yesterday:

    There is considerable speculation and buzz in Washington today suggesting that the National Security Council has agreed in principle to proceed with plans to attack an Iranian al-Qods-run camp that is believed to be training Iraqi militants. The camp that will be targeted is one of several located near Tehran. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was the only senior official urging delay in taking any offensive action. The decision to go ahead with plans to attack Iran is the direct result of concerns being expressed over the deteriorating situation in Lebanon, where Iranian ally Hezbollah appears to have gained the upper hand against government forces and might be able to dominate the fractious political situation. The White House contacted the Iranian government directly yesterday through a channel provided by the leadership of the Kurdish region in Iraq, which has traditionally had close ties to Tehran. The US demanded that Iran admit that it has been interfering in Iraq and also commit itself to taking steps to end the support of various militant groups. There was also a warning about interfering in Lebanon. The Iranian government reportedly responded quickly, restating its position that it would not discuss the matter until the US ceases its own meddling employing Iranian dissident groups. The perceived Iranian intransigence coupled with the Lebanese situation convinced the White House that some sort of unambiguous signal has to be sent to the Iranian leadership, presumably in the form of cruise missiles. It is to be presumed that the attack will be as “pinpoint” and limited as possible, intended to target only al-Qods and avoid civilian casualties. The decision to proceed with plans for an attack is not final. The President will still have to give the order to launch after all preparations are made.
Hard to believe this is true. A quite illegal use of US armed force against targets inside Iran-- forget this silly whitewash about "pinpoint"-- and this would be just to "send a signal"?

In the present circumstances the signal would be not just to Iran but to the world. The signal would say: "World! You need to rein in this lunatic power seated in Washington, urgently, before it does anything more to cause mayhem, chaos, destruction, death, and ever higher oil prices."

Oh, and GWB will be in Israel Wednesday, very publicly lauding the United States' close and appreciative friendship with Israel. Just what the world needs to see this week, eh? (Irony alert.)



Comments
Comment from... Craig, at May 10, 2008 04:05 PM:

If you think there's any limit to how crazy Bush and his neocon friends are, you haven't been paying attention.

Comment from... Don Bacon, at May 10, 2008 04:29 PM:

1. The Revguards read the newspapers too so the US cruise missile targets would be empty buildings/training areas.

2. Those big grey ships out on the Gulf can't be emptied so they would be prime Iran cruise missile targets, as well as US targets in Iraq with ballistic and cruise missiles.

3. One wild card now is the two Marine Expeditionary Units in the Gulf with a third having left San Diego Sunday and probably on the way. Will they be used against Revguard-occupied Gulf Islands? Suspected cruise missile sites on the mainland? Or what?

4. Rmember that Hezbollah partially destroyed an Israeli warship in the Med two years ago. The nature of warfare has changed. Smaller is now better and the Iranians are not defenseless by any means. Looks like show time is coming.

Comment from... Mayor, at May 11, 2008 10:01 PM:

May god strengthen the hand of the US, and may the US hasten before the game goes nuclear. And if I may have a third wish, may we see sad Briton ladies carrying water for Iran and Hezbollah, carry it all the way to the Persian gulf and stay there. Their voices are as hysterical as disonant.

Recent Posts on JWN
• The Color of Iran's Elections (15)
• George Mitchell is doing what?? (24)
• Does Obama understand Israel's war goal in Iran? (81)
• Newsweek: "Everything you know about Iran is Wrong" (16)
• Closing Gitmo: The Abe Lincoln solution (18)
• Iran Politics: It's the foreign policy, stupid. (12)
• IPS piece on Turkey's role in region, world (35)
• Transit systems, Turkey (2)
• More on 'natural growth' in settlements (1)
• Thinking on Iran decision-making (9)
• Why Israel's 'natural growth' claim is dishonest: Four reasons (3)
• Abbas losing support from Fateh (10)
• Open Thread, Istanbul, London (16)
• My IPS piece on Netanyahu's big meeting with Obama (23)
• Uzi Arad in Washington (9)
• Uzi Arad and other aspects of Netanyahu's Washington visit (33)
• After Hamas's Hudna, what? (9)
• Dayton on his Palestinian army's prospects (9)
• An informed view of Hamas policy (14)
• J. Cook on the Pope in Nazareth (10)
• Meshaal on the Palestinian state alongside Israel; Nunu on the tahdi'eh (0)
• Meshaal: the longer NYT text, and a question about Haaretz (4)
• Palestine/Bantustans (3)
• On Qatar and Sheikha Mozah (11)
• Palestine: The archipelago 'map', spaciocide, etc. (14)
• My piece in The Nation on Hamas (2)
• Obama and Israel's nukes (8)
• Advancing Security and Opportunity -- US Style (5)
• White House (still) guiding Middle East policy (13)
• Mondoweiss tweets AIPAC (10)
• US MSM and Latin America (5)
• NYT interviews Meshaal (5)
• Discussing Hamas with Allister Sparks (41)
• New reports on press and other freedoms (7)
• Some notes from UNESCO klatch, Doha (9)
• Another Scary Terror Report (11)
• The Year of the Ox II (7)
• IPS piece on Lebanon (9)
• Hariri court orders generals' release; case in disarray (6)
• Obama opens timid discussion with Congress on Hamas (6)
• Netanyahu and the 'Palestinian state' card (12)
• China Hand on the bleak prospects for the US in Afghanistan (4)
• 'Sensitive' developments in Saudi Arabia? Succession-related? (5)
• Videos from the recent Georgetown University CCAS conference (0)
• More dishonest argumentation from the WaPo's Hoagland (12)
• Ahmadinejad: "Whatever decision they (Palestininians) take is fine with us" (13)
• Destruction of mosques in Israel after 1948 (12)
• IPS piece on coming Obama-Netanyahu spat (27)
• On bank governance: A modest proposal (11)
• Sort of catching up here (5)