US-led force to leave part of Sinai? This is huge!


Posted by Helena Cobban
January 24, 2008 9:24 AM EST | Link
Filed in Palestine 2008

Debka-file started reporting at 9:38 a.m. GMT today that early today,

    American forces and equipment withdrew from the Multi-force Organization base at Al Gura northeast of al Arish. This force monitors Sinai’s demilitarization under a key clause of the Egypt-Israel peace treaty. Washington and Cairo are discussing evacuating the entire base and its 400 multinational personnel. The Egyptian high command was informed that Hamas had begun moving some of its elite units to its new stronghold. Egyptian forces are not capable of contending with this strength or the hundreds of thousands of Gazan Palestinians on the move between Gaza and Sinai since Hamas blew up the concrete border fence Tuesday.
If true-- and I have no reason to doubt that it is-- then this is huge.

The Multi-National Force and Observers (MFO) was created in 1979 as a US-led "coalition of the willing" force tasked with monitoring implementation of the 1979 peace treaty between Israel and Egypt. If the force is now being redeployed (=withdrawn) from the area bordering Gaza, that is already a major development. But now, in addition, Egypt and Washington are discussing evacuating the El-Gorah base, which is one of the MFO's two main operating bases?

The political crisis in Cairo provoked by yesterday's bust-out of Palestinians from Gaza into Sinai seems to be much deeper than I had previously thought.

(By the way, when I linked to a Debka-file report on the Gaza-Egypt situation in this JWN post yesterday, the URL there was the same as the URL linked to above. DF should understand that it's confusing for readers when they almost completely change the content of a published file after publication! I imagine that very diligent readers who want to find the whole text of the earlier DF report could do so by searching through caches?)



Comments
Comment from... Jonathan Edelstein, at January 24, 2008 11:12 AM:

My rule of thumb about DEBKA-file is not to believe anything they say unless it's corroborated. Whoever runs that site has a tendency to publish rumor without differentiating it from fact, which means that although some of their reports are factual, it's impossible to tell which without cross-checking other sources.

They lost all credibility with me the day they reported that Arafat was willing to settle for 65 percent of the West Bank. But that's another story, both literally and figuratively.

Comment from... Jonathan Edelstein, at January 24, 2008 12:10 PM:

BTW, if it is true that "Hamas had begun moving some of its elite units to its new stronghold," then is north Sinai now Palestinian-occupied territory?

Comment from... m.hasan, at January 24, 2008 12:13 PM:

Do not rely too much on Debka file . It is a site designed to spread disinformation similar to the bureau established to dissiminate disinformation before the American invasion of Iraq. The scene of thousands of women, children, old and young palestinians flooding the borders towards Egypt was a scandal for the Israeli state in front of the world. it showed the extent that this state has reached in its unethicality . Those scenes proved that the state of Israel has no ethical problem in starving those thousands of civilian human beings to death and blaming it to the palestinians or someone else. No doubt you will read and hear a lot to distract attention and to lay the blame on others like Egypt or Iran or Syria or whatever.

Comment from... JES, at January 24, 2008 12:41 PM:

Jonathan,

I tend to agree with you on both counts. Debka is a right-wing, settler propaganda site; not a source of reliable information, in my opinion.

I had also thought about the fact that it appears that Hamas considering Sinai to be the Palestinian "hinterland", and their positioning troops there may constitute an occupation of sovereign Egyptian territory. Interesting turn of events.

BTW, this whole episode is far from the forefront of concern in Israel today. Much more attention is being given to the upcoming Winograd report.

Recent Posts on JWN
• The Color of Iran's Elections (15)
• George Mitchell is doing what?? (24)
• Does Obama understand Israel's war goal in Iran? (81)
• Newsweek: "Everything you know about Iran is Wrong" (16)
• Closing Gitmo: The Abe Lincoln solution (18)
• Iran Politics: It's the foreign policy, stupid. (12)
• IPS piece on Turkey's role in region, world (35)
• Transit systems, Turkey (2)
• More on 'natural growth' in settlements (1)
• Thinking on Iran decision-making (9)
• Why Israel's 'natural growth' claim is dishonest: Four reasons (3)
• Abbas losing support from Fateh (10)
• Open Thread, Istanbul, London (16)
• My IPS piece on Netanyahu's big meeting with Obama (23)
• Uzi Arad in Washington (9)
• Uzi Arad and other aspects of Netanyahu's Washington visit (33)
• After Hamas's Hudna, what? (9)
• Dayton on his Palestinian army's prospects (9)
• An informed view of Hamas policy (14)
• J. Cook on the Pope in Nazareth (10)
• Meshaal on the Palestinian state alongside Israel; Nunu on the tahdi'eh (0)
• Meshaal: the longer NYT text, and a question about Haaretz (4)
• Palestine/Bantustans (3)
• On Qatar and Sheikha Mozah (11)
• Palestine: The archipelago 'map', spaciocide, etc. (14)
• My piece in The Nation on Hamas (2)
• Obama and Israel's nukes (8)
• Advancing Security and Opportunity -- US Style (5)
• White House (still) guiding Middle East policy (13)
• Mondoweiss tweets AIPAC (10)
• US MSM and Latin America (5)
• NYT interviews Meshaal (5)
• Discussing Hamas with Allister Sparks (41)
• New reports on press and other freedoms (7)
• Some notes from UNESCO klatch, Doha (9)
• Another Scary Terror Report (11)
• The Year of the Ox II (7)
• IPS piece on Lebanon (9)
• Hariri court orders generals' release; case in disarray (6)
• Obama opens timid discussion with Congress on Hamas (6)
• Netanyahu and the 'Palestinian state' card (12)
• China Hand on the bleak prospects for the US in Afghanistan (4)
• 'Sensitive' developments in Saudi Arabia? Succession-related? (5)
• Videos from the recent Georgetown University CCAS conference (0)
• More dishonest argumentation from the WaPo's Hoagland (12)
• Ahmadinejad: "Whatever decision they (Palestininians) take is fine with us" (13)
• Destruction of mosques in Israel after 1948 (12)
• IPS piece on coming Obama-Netanyahu spat (27)
• On bank governance: A modest proposal (11)
• Sort of catching up here (5)