Discussing Bush's speech at IFF


Posted by Helena Cobban
January 11, 2007 3:52 PM EST | Link
Filed in US foreign policy

Joost Hiltermann, Reidar Visser, Patrick Lang, Howard Zinn, and I are all discussing the Prez's speech over at this discussion zone established by the Institute for the Future of the Book.

I'm pretty sure more people will join the discussion as we progress. Actually, what we really need are some folks prepared to go there and articulate the best kinds of defense the Prez might mount against what for now looks like a barrage of criticism. (Should I play "Devil's Advocate", I wonder?)

It's an interesting format they have at IFF (and still to be further refined, I think.) My colleagues have all posted some excellent contributions. General readers may-- or may not?-- also be allowed to contribute. Sorry, I'm not quite clear about that, yet.



Comments
Comment from... Michael Murry, at January 11, 2007 09:30 PM:

Helena,

Please try to get into your discussion the classic case of double-bind schizophrenia in which the American Lunatic Leviathan now finds itself. A root discontinuity in American policy now mindlessly prolongs American and Iraqi agony in Iraq -- the same one that perpetuated American and Vietnamese agony in Vietnam three decades ago. On the one hand, the American Lunatic Leviathan has said that it can't quit wrecking a third-world country that never attacked America because to stop wrecking it would bring about more wreckage. On the other hand, the Lunatic Leviathan says that if its installed and illegitimate bad puppet doesn't wreck itself so that America doesn't have to the dirty, pointless deed, then the Lunatic Leviathan might leave and stop wrecking the place. Welcome to the solipsistic, schizophrenic, double-thinking, Kissinger-advised mind of Lyndon Milhous Bush.

Comment from... Mark, at January 12, 2007 04:55 AM:

I can't read the panel's comments because a good part of the text is off the edge of my screen and it won't move over. Bummer.

Recent Posts on JWN
• Realism, war, and pacifism (3)
• Palin's performance: Insulting and very scary (28)
• September 11 and the war in Afghanistan (6)
• US's global dominance 'Reduced': It's nearly official! (1)
• JWN redesign update #1 (2)
• Oliver North??? (5)
• J. Diehl criticizing Saakashvili (3)
• Peres warns against attacking Iran (0)
• Georgia-Hizbullah: Dept. of Delicious Ironies (2)
• US probing Russian Red Lines in Georgia (0)
• Women discuss Sarah Palin (26)
• New vistas-- personal, and blog-related (12)
• The longterm status of Georgia: Challenges ahead (20)
• Text of the draft Iraq-US SOFA (10)
• HRW revising its Russian cluster bomb accusations (11)
• International tensions and the US election (9)
• Iraq: Another Quaker in the 'Red Zone' (3)
• HRW's flawed 'Research' on Georgian cluster bombs (20)
• More on China in Iraq (12)
• Post on China in US occupied zones-- at Japan Focus (0)
• Palin and the 3 a.m. phone call (39)
• China and Iraq (4)
• Egyptian delegation to break Gaza siege (2)
• Waiting for Gustav (5)
• Italy gives Libya $$ compensation for colonial rule (17)
• China buys in to Iraqi, Afghan end-games (15)
• "Resolution": Palin's goal in Iraq (8)
• China's way of 'Emerging' (6)
• A note on US politics (6)
• Conway does a Dannatt (sort of) (7)
• China gets Iraq oil deal (6)
• Rest-of-world saving US from recession? (5)
• Russia and the world (12)
• Milanovic: From Global Trade to Global War (5)
• The return of geography (3)
• Still no US-Iraq security agreement (yawn) (2)
• Iraq-US: More disagreement than 'Agreement' (23)
• NATO's supply lines in Afghanistan (27)
• My CSM piece on the big-picture implications of Georgia (21)
• Mahbubani on western hypocrisy, etc. (5)
• Condi in Baghdad: YES on a timetable (aspirational) (8)
• More on NATO, etc. (14)
• NATO's crisis (8)
• And another thing about Finland (23)
• Where in the world is... Ban Ki-Moon? (22)
• Russian military assessment: New arms race? (26)
• And now for a little audio (0)
• Yglesias nails McCain (4)
• Sarkozy's ceasefire, Georgia's future (22)
• Georgia crisis and the shifting global balance (0)