Zeyad compiles Iraqi bloggers' reactions to Saddam's hanging


Posted by Helena Cobban
January 1, 2007 11:27 AM EST | Link
Filed in Iraq-2007-Q1

Zeyad of Healing Iraq has a very informative compilation of the main reactions that Iraqis blogging in English have had to Saddam Hussein's hanging. (Okay, it's also posted at IraqSlogger; but that's not to say it ain't worth reading. It certainly is.)

He has reactions from 23 bloggers representing a broad range of political positions. They all look very thoughtful, and many of them express the idea that, though the author may well have looked forward to this day, still the way that it eventually happened left them disquieted or even disgusted.

Some highlights:

From Sami - Iraqi Thoughts:

    I don't think the situation will change in Iraq much because the people who hate Saddam or love him are all still going to have the same deep hatred and divisons towards each other. Unity isn't about being the same but about accepting each other's differences and the way Iraqis act that does not look like happening any time soon.
From 24 Steps to Liberty:
    What's next? Does it mean my family will be safe now that Saddam Hussein is dead? Does it mean the Iraqis will stop hating each other and killing each other? There are no more Shiites and Sunnis slaughtering each other? [Ironically Hussein is accused of provoking sectarian conflict in Iraq!] Did they [Iraqi government and their advisors] think killing Saddam Hussein will unite the Iraqis and solve the problem? The answer to those questions is: No. And they don't care!
From Dr. Fadhil Badran:
    The assassination of Saddam Hussein has killed the last hope of peace in Iraq. I think, this assassination has been planned by Iran, Israel, and Britain; those players used the US as a fire-catcher! Iran chose to assassinate him on the 1st. day of Al-Ad'ha to say that the Eid is not on the 30th of December, which means that Muslims are not unified, and of course because Saddam had stopped the Persian dream to occupy the Arab countries in the gulf area. Israel has chose the way of assassination by Hanging him to make revenge for the Israeli spies who were hanged in Baghdad in 1969. Britain insists on the assassination for the revenge of Saddam Hussein nationalization of the Iraqi petroleum in 1971. The only losers in this event are the Iraqis and the American soldiers in Iraq.
... Actually, I'm finding it hard to pick out the "highlights" in this compilation. Nearly everything Zeyad included there is really worth reading. I'm afraid he set it up so that to read the whole thing you have to go to the IraqSlogger version.

In general, Zeyad did a great job of including bloggers from political positions very different from his own, as well as those similar to himself. On the other hand, the political views of many people in Iraq, including Zeyad, have been changing so rapidly recently-- and mainly, I think, in a strongly anti-US direction-- that it's getting very hard to make informed judgments (or even guessess) about where many of them "stand".

Zeyad didn't include Riverbend's impassioned criticism of the whole execution process... But then, River didn't post it till 10:12 p.m., so maybe he hadn't seen it when he did his compilation.

He did include the blogged-in-English reactions of all three of Faiza's sons. But he didn't include any blogged-in-Arabic material. Here, for good Arabic readers, are Faiza's reflections on the subject, posted yesterday.



Comments
Comment from... Salah, at January 1, 2007 08:33 PM:

Wow look to Saad Albazzaz what he report about Saddam :

هيئة الدفاع عن الرئيس الراحل صدام:"

http://www.azzaman.com/new/

Looks he feels back to his old days when he was one of his regime tool

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)