Arms exports mania


Posted by Helena Cobban
June 7, 2006 11:49 PM EST | Link
Filed in Antiwar

My copy of the 2006 edition of the annual Military Balance assessment produced by the International Institute for Strategic Studies dropped heavily into my mailbox today. I enjoy looking through their generally fairly reliable information, and have used it as a reference source ever since I worked in the Reuters bureau in Beirut, back in the day...

So, our big fact for today (p.404): In 2004, for the first time ever, the US's share of the international arms trade rose above 50%. To be precise, it was 53.4%.

The runners-up in this contest of shame were:

    Russia-- 13.2%
    France-- 12.7%
    Britain-- 5.5%
    Germany-- 2.6%
    China-- 2.0%
But look, isn't this just the most amazing coincidence: Of the six front-running arms-exporters, five of them are veto-wielding permanent members on the UN Security Council. (And these are also the five "recognized" nuclear-weapons states.)

But it seems that not being content with having their own huge nuclear and "conventional" arsenals, these states want to get the rest of the world hooked on the arms-acquisition habit, too.

US arms transfers to other countries in 2004 came to a total value of $18.55 billion. Imagine what that sum of money could have achieved for real human security if it had been invested in schools, health-centers, roads, and safe-water systems instead...



Comments
Comment from... Maryam, at June 8, 2006 01:39 PM:

The leaders of these shameful weapon selling countries desire a safe and secure state of health, life, education and future for their own families, children and kin. They do not see themselves connected to the rest of the world. If they had a sense of connectedness and belonging to the rest of mankind, they would never wish to sell destructive means and rob them from a safe future. Why are these leaders, these individual feel so apart from the rest of the world? Are they any better? Any different? should they deserve a better life than other people in the world? I am curious about the pscyology behind this phenomena?
--Maryam

Comment from... Salah, at June 8, 2006 03:16 PM:

I think there is one country missing here which is Israel, there is reports about their arm export also on rise also Israeli did some supports for group and gorilla by diverted arm from old commonest countries to the other courtiers

Arming the Occupation: Israel and the Arms Trade

Comment from... J. Hanson, at June 9, 2006 01:57 AM:

Interesting- the Palestinians have received at least 18 billion dollars worth of international aid over the years and have wasted all of it (other than supplying terrorists with weapons and suicide belts). Imagine if THAT sum of money had been invested in schools (that don't teach hatred of Jews), roads, health centers and safe water systems instead.

Comment from... Salah, at June 12, 2006 06:01 PM:

Military expenditure in MER dollar terms
USA Spending 478.2($ b.

The 15 major spender countries in 2005 (pdf-document)
This table lists the 15 major spender countries, converted to constant (2003) US$ by market and PPP exchange rates.
http://www.sipri.org/contents/milap/milex/mex_major_spenders.pdf

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)