Rumors of violence


Posted by Helena Cobban
September 7, 2005 7:35 AM EST | Link
Filed in Culture

This is an interesting account by Matt Welch of how dark rumors about the disorderly and violent tendencies of the low-income and mainly black evacuees from New Orleans have often preceded them to their places of (let's hope) temporary refuge...

But Welch also writes that "none of the reports were true."

I think that was referring to reports of violence committed in Baton Rouge, after evacuation. But he also pulls in several pieces of evidence showing that the reports of violence inside New Orleans prior to evacuation were in some cases untrue and in others greatly exaggerated.

Welch writes about the staggering lack of information suffered by everyone in New Orleans during the worst days last week, and how that contributed to the ease with which scary rumors got circulated. (He doesn't mention the private security companies, like Blackwater, that were also making successful-- and I should imagine, very lucrative-- bids for contracts to "protect" media stars and others eager to get into the city to do their stand-uppers. I wonder how their sales pitch went, exactly?)

Welch adds:

    it's entirely possible that, like the chimeric Baton Rouge hordes, exaggerations about New Orleans' criminality affected policy, mostly by delaying rescue operations and the provision of aid. Relief efforts ground to a halt last week after reports circulated of looters shooting at helicopters, yet none of the hundreds of articles I read on the subject contained a single first-hand confirmation from a pilot or eyewitness. The suspension-triggering attack--on a military Chinook attempting to evacuate refugees from the Superdome--was contested by Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Laura Brown, who told ABC News, "We're controlling every single aircraft in that airspace and none of them reported being fired on." What's more, when asked about the attacks, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff replied: "I haven't actually received a confirmed report of someone firing on a helicopter."
I just note that even though I was born after the second World War, in England there were still lots of stories about the hostility that kids evacuated from London during the Blitz faced from the (mainly rural) communities that received them.



Comments
Comment from... JES, at September 7, 2005 07:49 AM:

I suspected that this might be the case. The only day that I watched television coverage, I heard the commanding general of the Mississippi National Guard describing how they had received reports of personal violence, only to discover when they arrived that they were not true. His theory was that people exaggerated in an effort to get the Guard in faster.

Comment from... Salah, at September 7, 2005 07:56 AM:

Laura Brown, who told ABC News, "We're controlling every single aircraft in that ‎airspace and none of them reported being fired on.

Communication is a mess here, pilots say. Crews are flying into areas with chopper ‎loads of bottled water and MRE's - meals ready to eat - and finding supplies have ‎already been delivered.‎
‎"If they say they've already got stuff, we just fly around until we find someone who ‎needs it," said pilot Michael Fair, a chief warrant officer with the Ohio National ‎Guard.‎

‎Soldiers ‎: Storm-Ravaged Areas Are No Iraq
By BRIAN SKOLOFF
Associated Press Writer

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)