A Valentine from the WaPo


Posted by Helena Cobban
February 14, 2005 7:59 PM EST | Link
Filed in Writing and publishing

Well, you know that in some places around the world, women's rights, interests, and voice have been getting progressively devalued over recent years (while in others they've been becoming progressively more valued.)

In Iraq, I am afraid that women's interests are about to be rolled back by the incoming regime.

And in Washington DC, women's voices have almost certainly been rolled back a lot over the past 10-15 years.

Today, "Valentine's Day", I'm sad to report to you the final findings of the "Women getting WaPo-ed" count that I've been maintaining for the past eight weeks.

Today, the WGW count finally tells us that the men who run the most influential newspaper in the most important city in the world value women's voices precisely one-ninth as much as they value men's voices.

That is, as of today, the WGW count stands at exactly 10%. Over the past eight weeks, precisely 26 of the 260 authored pieces on the Washington Post's op-ed pages have been authored by women. (And I've been "generous" in assigning to the women's score genders that weren't easy to assign.)

I note that people in the west frequently get conniptions when they learn that in some Islamic codes of law, a man's testimony in court "counts" for as much as that of two women.

But how many conniptions do we hear from Washingtonians when they contemplate the gross gender imbalance on the Op-Ed page of their daily paper? Nine men's voices for every woman's voice that gets published?

What is all that about???

It is my strong belief, moreover, that the gender imbalance on the WaPo's op-ed pages has gotten worse over the past 10-15 years, not better. I don't have any figures for that, but if any of you readers has some figures from the past, please send 'em on over!

At least, now, I've established what I hope will be an absolute rock-bottom base-line for the WGW count. I'm sincerely hoping the count will only go up from here? Maybe I'll run it again some time in the future.

But for now, the Valentine's Day message that the men who run the WaPo are sending to the women they encounter in their professional life seems to be this:

    Hey, suckers! We're happy to advertise to you, write gossip columns about you, have you do the leg-work in a number of our reporting assignments... But treat your opinions as something worth paying attention to?

    Fuggedaboutit, suckers!

    Just keep buying the skimpy lingerie we peddle to you all over our main pages and shut up!"

And Happy Valentine's Day to you, too, guys!



Comments
Recent Posts on JWN
• Realism, war, and pacifism (3)
• Palin's performance: Insulting and very scary (28)
• September 11 and the war in Afghanistan (6)
• US's global dominance 'Reduced': It's nearly official! (1)
• JWN redesign update #1 (2)
• Oliver North??? (5)
• J. Diehl criticizing Saakashvili (3)
• Peres warns against attacking Iran (0)
• Georgia-Hizbullah: Dept. of Delicious Ironies (2)
• US probing Russian Red Lines in Georgia (0)
• Women discuss Sarah Palin (26)
• New vistas-- personal, and blog-related (12)
• The longterm status of Georgia: Challenges ahead (20)
• Text of the draft Iraq-US SOFA (10)
• HRW revising its Russian cluster bomb accusations (11)
• International tensions and the US election (9)
• Iraq: Another Quaker in the 'Red Zone' (3)
• HRW's flawed 'Research' on Georgian cluster bombs (20)
• More on China in Iraq (12)
• Post on China in US occupied zones-- at Japan Focus (0)
• Palin and the 3 a.m. phone call (39)
• China and Iraq (4)
• Egyptian delegation to break Gaza siege (2)
• Waiting for Gustav (5)
• Italy gives Libya $$ compensation for colonial rule (17)
• China buys in to Iraqi, Afghan end-games (15)
• "Resolution": Palin's goal in Iraq (8)
• China's way of 'Emerging' (6)
• A note on US politics (6)
• Conway does a Dannatt (sort of) (7)
• China gets Iraq oil deal (6)
• Rest-of-world saving US from recession? (5)
• Russia and the world (12)
• Milanovic: From Global Trade to Global War (5)
• The return of geography (3)
• Still no US-Iraq security agreement (yawn) (2)
• Iraq-US: More disagreement than 'Agreement' (23)
• NATO's supply lines in Afghanistan (27)
• My CSM piece on the big-picture implications of Georgia (21)
• Mahbubani on western hypocrisy, etc. (5)
• Condi in Baghdad: YES on a timetable (aspirational) (8)
• More on NATO, etc. (14)
• NATO's crisis (8)
• And another thing about Finland (23)
• Where in the world is... Ban Ki-Moon? (22)
• Russian military assessment: New arms race? (26)
• And now for a little audio (0)
• Yglesias nails McCain (4)
• Sarkozy's ceasefire, Georgia's future (22)
• Georgia crisis and the shifting global balance (0)