What a serious mea culpa looks like


Posted by Helena Cobban
August 5, 2004 10:01 AM EST | Link
Filed in Culture

... It looks like this. (Thanks to Yankeedoodle for signaling it.)



Comments
Comment from... Vivion, at August 6, 2004 08:33 AM:

This article is infuriating. As an example, Dilanian says:

"I just couldn't conceive, given how severely the lack of electricity undermines everything they are trying to achieve, that the Americans would publicly set a goal and then fail to meet it."

If this guy had been doing his homework all along, he would have known that from Day 1 after the invasion, looters had been systematically disassembling the electricity grid. There were quotes in news articles saying that there was simply no way to get the core infrastructure back up any time soon, and that engineers were looking at stop-gap measures. Maybe I missed something, but I never saw anything in the news addressing this fundamental issue.

And, somehow, we are supposed to look at this, and similar situations with equally poor prospects, and see improvement?

What an idiot. At least he corrected himself, which is better than most of the other idiots out there.

Comment from... Davol White, at August 6, 2004 01:58 PM:

This war has been fought with lies from the beginning. The bigotry of our out-of-touch leaders has blinded them to the reality that is really occuring. Islamists are being tortured in order to get them to agree with us about the nature of the insurgency instead of getting them to really say the truth. This is pure folly fueled by classic American racism. Let's face it, we are fighting AlQuaeda in Iraq because they basically all have the same skin color. Now American bigotry has become a denial that will bite us with defeat if we don't start taking a look at Iraq without the lens of bullshit in the way. I personally think the Halliburtons and Bechtels are just milking the situration to take our tax dollars in exchange for nothing accomplished. Even if Iraqi's can't rebuild their country any better then Halliburton, at least they would fail at a fraction of the cost. Who could have forseen that we couldn't win over the hearts and minds of Iraqi's by looting their country, treating them like dogs, and unemploying them?

Comment from... Frenchie Bushwad, at August 7, 2004 02:01 AM:

Didn't anyone catch the part about how critical the possible loss of cell phone service is to Iraqi liberty,just-us,and the persuit of on-line dating services.How can the enemy set off their roadside explosive devices remotely.How ironic.The first thing we do in Iraq is make sure they have DSL service & cell phones.The revolutionaries in Iraq can now,not only keep up with what their organizations in other cities are up to,but can also use their new phones as remote detonators to kill us with.I was in VietNam & this is no VietNam.It is worse!!!!!!

Comment from... John Koch, at August 7, 2004 09:32 AM:

Ken Dilanian had credentials as a "safe" pro-war reporter to get this article in print, perhaps under the ultra-senior editors' radar. Don't expect the broadcast or cable TV networks to issue similar self-revisions. The news will remain up-beat, or it will quietly retreat to tier 3 news. Mr. Murdoch need not risk any scandals or negative reports that might harm the desired November election results.

The queer thing is that the Max Boot and David Frum types will claim that the entire quagmire was the fault of "lack of nerve" attributable to liberal bleeding hearts the the perfidious press, which sapped America's courage to shoot and aided the enemy. Astonishingly, however, they will also argue that the Iraq adventure is a wonderful display of US force projection that should be applied next year to de-nuke and liberate Iran. The initial battlefield events will be trumpeted as the neo-con triumph; the botched follow-up will be the blamed on others.

Americans usually buy in to the notion that "the politicians" goof up what the men in uniform would otherwise do right. Example: that we'd have won in Korea, if only we'd let McArthur nuke and invade China, or in Vietnam, if only we'd let LeMay "bomb Hanoi into the Stone Age." They don't actually explore whether high officers might be just as prone to delusions of grandeur or nonsense.

The only real mea culpa will be the day that someone like Tommy Franks stands up and says, "We got it all wrong: intelligence, strategy, follow-up, the whole darn Krispy Kreme. And it ain't true that 'hearts and minds' is a bunch a hooey. Hearts and minds do matter, and we got it plug wrong in Iraq from the get-go." Even then, though, I can imagine that Boot, Frum, and JHU's Eliot Cohen will simply say that generals, too, lose there marbles, and so we need sturdy civilian leaders of undaunted vision--like W.

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)