Bantustans: South Africa and Palestine


Posted by Helena Cobban
July 27, 2004 2:52 PM EST | Link
Filed in Palestinian issues

How quickly the world forgets. Back in the 1960s and 1970s, the apartheid government in South Africa pushed forward its plan to create "Bantu homelands" within South Africa which would:

    (a) be small, territorially non-contiguous, and located in some of the country's most unfertile regions, and

    (b) be totally under the control of the Pretoria government in practice, even though four of the ten homelands were given a nominal "independence". (Note the importance of the fact that no significant outside powers--except Israel!--ever gave formal recognition to this "independence".)

What did the map of all of South Africa with the ten tiny homelands inside it look like? It looked like this. Maps of the Bantustans are so hard to come by these days that it took me a while to find that one: it came from vol. 7 of the TRC's report, p.935.

When you look at that map, remember that the Black African population of South Africa at the time was more than 75% of the total. No wonder the vast majority of the country's people rose up to oppose that system, and replaced it with a unitary system of one-person-one-vote democracy.

So here, now, are some maps that show what has been happning to the occupied Palestinian territories during the 37 years of Israel's military occupation:

First up, this very clear map from the Foundation for Middle East Peace that shows the "leopard spots" of limited self-government in the occupied West Bank that the Palestinians were allowed under the post-Oslo "peace process" of 1993-2000.

Then, we have this map of the situation in Gaza as of last October. It comes from the UN's Office for the Coordinator of Humanitarian Affairs. If you click on the link for the large version there, you can see clearly just how much of the surface-area of Gaza is now off-limits to the Palestinians, because of the Israeli settlements and various "security" needs. And oh, the Israeli "security roads" just happen to cut the "Palestinian" parts of Gaza into four non-contiguous chunks.

There are a few other things worth remembering in this picture...

The first is that the number of Palestinians in Gaza is over 1.2 million, and the population of Israeli settlers somewhere under 8,000. Figure out what that means for relative population density inside the Strip!

The second is that the whole "butterfly wing" of the occupied West Bank and the whole "Strip" of Gaza between them represent less than 23% of the surface area of Mandate-era Palestine. Since the 1970s, the PLO has worked hard (though not very effectively) to win the "liberation" of these two portions of their historic homeland from Israeli rule, with the general idea--sometimes articulated, sometimes not--that this portion of land would, at the end of the day, satisfy the Palestinian people's desire to establish a national state in the homeland.

But now, the settlement policies pursued by every single Israeli government down to the present one have, between them, gobbled up increasing chunks of even this fragment of the Palestinians' earlier homeland.

There are over 8 million Palestinians now living in and around the area of Mandate Palestine. 1.1 million of them live inside and have citizenship in Israel itself; 3.3 million live in the occupied territories; and some 3.7 million are refugees registered in surrounding countries.

There are about 5.2 million Jewish Israelis.

What is an equitable outcome? One could envisage it taking the form of either a unitary, binational state in the whole of Israel/Palestine, or the form of two mainly mono-national states living side by side in peace. But as I frequently say, a viable two-state solution depends on there being two viable states. And the kind of territorial outcome that Sharon and the rest of the Israeli elite seem to be heading toward looks very, very far from this...

In fact, it looks much more like this.



Comments
Comment from... Dom, at July 28, 2004 11:32 AM:

Child torture in Iraq.

Go to http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/072004_torturing_children.shtml (FromTheWilderness.com)

Comment from... Lars, at July 28, 2004 02:43 PM:

What is your source for saying that Israel did at one time recognize South Africa's Bantustans? I've heard this before and am sure it's true, but would like the citation the next time the Palestine-Israel dispute comes up.

Comment from... John Koch, at July 29, 2004 11:05 AM:

"Leopard" maps not just in Africa. Look:

Link:
http://www.geocities.com/tula_hidalgo/dove/leopard.html

Comment from... Dom, at July 30, 2004 12:22 AM:

Concerning Sudan, see "Fill full the mouth of famine" by John Laughland at http://www.sandersresearch.com/Sanders/NewsManager/ShowNewsGen.aspx?NewsID=703

"...an all too banal case of modern imperialistic meddling".

Comment from... James R MacLean, at August 1, 2004 01:19 AM:

I was skeptical of the calls for intervention in Sudan, interpreting this as a replication of some of the features of the Kosovo intervention. But Mr Laughland's essya, while replete with footnotes, is mostly a hash of errors. The Serb Army and police did, in fact, massacre thousands of Kosovars; the "exposes" in the Guardian, et al., was directed at then-US Defense Secr. William Cohen's charge that the Serbs were killing "hundreds of thousands."

In the meantime, discussion split up between defenders of the engagement, and those who insist it was the greatest atrocity of all time (and motivated by a diabolical scheme to loot coal from Kosovo; or establish a money-bleeding peacekeeping operation in the province).

However, the allegations that the Sudanese government is abetting the janjawid are emanting from the NGO community, not national governments. If the current administration were intent on invading Sudan, it would have done so long ago. As for the oil that Mr Laughland refers to: this is actually trivial. The oil reserves are not large, recovery is costly, intervention would be fraught with international incidents...

The essay by Laughland does not refer to any of the evidence, it merely says that the genocide in Darfur is something made up by the West. The allusion to Turabi as "architect of Sudan's liberal, republican version of Islam" is surprising, giving his role in the Nimeiri and Bashir governments.

Unfortunately, it's easier to simply adopt a creed than actually examine the available information.

Comment from... Jonathan Edelstein, at August 4, 2004 12:59 PM:

What is your source for saying that Israel did at one time recognize South Africa's Bantustans? I've heard this before and am sure it's true

It isn't. Israel never formally recognized the bantustans, although it did participate in technical exchanges with them (the one of which I'm aware involved a judicial conference in Israel to which bantustan judges were invited).

In any event, while I agree that a cantonized WB and/or Gaza would function much like a bantustan, it's important to keep in mind that the bantustans were envisioned as permanent measures while the current Israeli occupation policies aren't. A viable two-state solution is still possible although it will take time.

Recent Posts on JWN
• Realism, war, and pacifism (3)
• Palin's performance: Insulting and very scary (28)
• September 11 and the war in Afghanistan (6)
• US's global dominance 'Reduced': It's nearly official! (1)
• JWN redesign update #1 (2)
• Oliver North??? (5)
• J. Diehl criticizing Saakashvili (3)
• Peres warns against attacking Iran (0)
• Georgia-Hizbullah: Dept. of Delicious Ironies (2)
• US probing Russian Red Lines in Georgia (0)
• Women discuss Sarah Palin (26)
• New vistas-- personal, and blog-related (12)
• The longterm status of Georgia: Challenges ahead (20)
• Text of the draft Iraq-US SOFA (10)
• HRW revising its Russian cluster bomb accusations (11)
• International tensions and the US election (9)
• Iraq: Another Quaker in the 'Red Zone' (3)
• HRW's flawed 'Research' on Georgian cluster bombs (20)
• More on China in Iraq (12)
• Post on China in US occupied zones-- at Japan Focus (0)
• Palin and the 3 a.m. phone call (39)
• China and Iraq (4)
• Egyptian delegation to break Gaza siege (2)
• Waiting for Gustav (5)
• Italy gives Libya $$ compensation for colonial rule (17)
• China buys in to Iraqi, Afghan end-games (15)
• "Resolution": Palin's goal in Iraq (8)
• China's way of 'Emerging' (6)
• A note on US politics (6)
• Conway does a Dannatt (sort of) (7)
• China gets Iraq oil deal (6)
• Rest-of-world saving US from recession? (5)
• Russia and the world (12)
• Milanovic: From Global Trade to Global War (5)
• The return of geography (3)
• Still no US-Iraq security agreement (yawn) (2)
• Iraq-US: More disagreement than 'Agreement' (23)
• NATO's supply lines in Afghanistan (27)
• My CSM piece on the big-picture implications of Georgia (21)
• Mahbubani on western hypocrisy, etc. (5)
• Condi in Baghdad: YES on a timetable (aspirational) (8)
• More on NATO, etc. (14)
• NATO's crisis (8)
• And another thing about Finland (23)
• Where in the world is... Ban Ki-Moon? (22)
• Russian military assessment: New arms race? (26)
• And now for a little audio (0)
• Yglesias nails McCain (4)
• Sarkozy's ceasefire, Georgia's future (22)
• Georgia crisis and the shifting global balance (0)