Actualités importantes rwando-congolaises


Posted by Helena Cobban
June 25, 2004 1:40 PM EST | Link
Filed in Africa--Rwanda

Et maintenant, des nouvelles assez bonnes venantes du sommet d'Abuja... Selon ce bulletin de l'agence AFP,

    Les présidents rwandais, Paul Kagame, et congolais, Joseph Kabila, se sont engagés une nouvelle fois à respecter l'accord de paix conclu en juillet 2002 à Pretoria, à l'issue d'un mini-sommet à Abuja organisé par le président nigérian Olusegun Obasanjo...

    Les trois présidents, au cours d'une conférence de presse commune, ont annoncé la mise en place d'un mécanisme de vérification conjoint qui devra s'assurer notamment du désarmement et de la démobilisation des soldats des ex-Forces armées rwandaises et des Interahamwe, qui ont commis le génocide de 1994 au Rwanda, encore présents en RDCongo, et de l'absence de troupes rwandaise du pays.

Alors, des meilleurs vœux que la diplomatie peux réussir.



Comments
Comment from... Jonathan Edelstein, at June 25, 2004 07:11 PM:

I hate to sound like a skeptic, but I'll wait to see if (1) they actually implement this process, and (2) Kabila lasts long enough to see it through.

Comment from... Helena, at June 27, 2004 10:51 AM:

No, Jonathan, you're not a (total) skeptic to want to see results before you judge on this.... Still, a verbal agreement to do the right thing is better than no such agreement. It would be great to see a big weight of global diplomacy getting behind this agreement, as also behind the really vital question of finding a way to stabilize governance in all of the DRC. Why, if even 1% of the amount of money and attention being spent on post-war chaos management in Iraq were put into stabilizing and helping failing states and embattled populations in Africa, it could make so much difference...

Comment from... Jonathan Edelstein, at June 28, 2004 12:15 PM:

Still, a verbal agreement to do the right thing is better than no such agreement.

True; if nothing else, it gives the parties a standard against which to be measured. I'm skeptical about Kabila's ability to carry it through, though; his control over the eastern provinces isn't very solid and he may not stay in power long enough to complete the disarmament process. Also, while Kagame does control his country, I'm not entirely sure he wants the conflict in the eastern DRC to end; fractiousness there serves a number of political goals for the RPF.

It would be great to see a big weight of global diplomacy getting behind this agreement, as also behind the really vital question of finding a way to stabilize governance in all of the DRC.

It definitely would. I tend to think a decentralized federal system is the only kind that can work in the DRC given the absence of infrastructure and the lack of anything resembling a national consciousness. The trouble is that African federalism often results in power devolving to a collection of local strongmen rather than a single strongman in the capital. In the near term, it may be best for the international community to focus on keeping the peace, building civil society and fostering dialogues on the ultimate structure of government.

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)