How to train abusers


Posted by Helena Cobban
June 5, 2004 8:10 AM EST | Link
Filed in War crimes etc

You want more clues as to how widespread physical abuse is in US-run detention facilities? Read about Specialist Sean Baker.

Baker was a member of a military-police unit in the Kentucky National Guard who pulled a tour of guard duty at Gitmo. One day in January 2003, an officer ordered Baker to play the role of a balky detainee in a training exercise. He put that dehumanizing orange jumpsuit on over his unifrm and cowered, as ordered, under a bed in a mock 'cell'.

According to this report by the NYT's Nick Kristof, this is what Baker said happened next:

    "They grabbed my arms, my legs, twisted me up and unfortunately one of the individuals got up on my back from behind and put pressure down on me while I was face down. Then he — the same individual — reached around and began to choke me and press my head down against the steel floor. After several seconds, 20 to 30 seconds, it seemed like an eternity because I couldn't breathe. When I couldn't breathe, I began to panic and I gave the code word I was supposed to give to stop the exercise, which was `red.' . . . That individual slammed my head against the floor and continued to choke me. Somehow I got enough air. I muttered out: `I'm a U.S. soldier. I'm a U.S. soldier.' "

    Then [continues Kristof] the soldiers noticed that he was wearing a U.S. battle dress uniform under the jumpsuit. Mr. Baker was taken to a military hospital for treatment of his head injuries, then flown to a Navy hospital in Portsmouth, Va. After a six-day hospitalization there, he was given a two-week discharge to rest.

    But Mr. Baker began suffering seizures, so the military sent him to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center for treatment of a traumatic brain injury. He stayed at the hospital for 48 days, was transferred to light duty... and was finally given a medical discharge two months ago.

    Meanwhile, a military investigation concluded that there had been no misconduct involved in Mr. Baker's injury. Hmm. The military also says it can't find a videotape that is believed to have been made of the incident.

    Most appalling, when Mr. Baker told his story to a Kentucky reporter, the military lied in a disgraceful effort to undermine his credibility.

Kristof notes that:

    Mr. Baker, who is married and has a 14-year-old son, is now unemployed, taking nine prescription medications and still suffering frequent seizures. His lawyer, Bruce Simpson, has been told that Mr. Baker may not begin to get disability payments for up to 18 months. If he is judged 100 percent disabled, he will then get a maximum of $2,100 a month.

    If the U.S. military treats one of its own soldiers this way — allowing him to be battered, and lying to cover it up — then imagine what happens to Afghans and Iraqis.

    President Bush attributed the problems uncovered at Abu Ghraib to "a few American troops who dishonored our country." Mr. Bush, the problems go deeper than a few bad apples.

Here's another really interesting question that should be followed up.

What happened to the soldier or soldiers who had treated Baker that way?

Were they flunked on their training course immediately, disciplined for their abuses of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Geneva Conventions, etc etc., and assigned to other, non-custodial duties?

Or, did they pass the training course with high grades, win promotions, and perhaps get sent to Iraq to help set up detention systems there?

H'mmm.



Comments
Comment from... Mary Ann, at June 5, 2004 11:22 AM:

And how many Iraqis are suffering from the same fate as this one soldier?

And when will we demand an investigation of Guantanamo?

I do note this morning that a UN official has called for an investigation into possible "war crimes" at Abu Ghraib.

Much more needs to be uncovered.

Comment from... Mary Ann, at June 5, 2004 11:59 AM:

See:

The Third Martyr
03 June 2004

"The pictures from Abu Ghraib won't just change the course of the war," writes Ameer U. Shaikh -- "they may transform Islam."

http://www.therevealer.org/archives/revealing_000391.php

Comment from... Charles Ling, at June 5, 2004 12:44 PM:

Helena,

I'm very sorry to see you using the euphamistic, better said Orwellian "abuse" rather than referring to torture as torture.

I know you are a good person who is more than educated enough to understand the difference.

Could you possibly find a moment to explain your thoughts on this?

Thnaks.

Comment from... Edward, at June 6, 2004 08:00 AM:

Maybe the members of congress and the White House should also try being a detainee.

Comment from... Mary Ann, at June 6, 2004 09:34 PM:

Yes, Edward. I agree. Before you send people to a prison, try it on for size. Before you send them to war, ditto.

Comment from... Helena, at June 7, 2004 10:33 AM:

Charles, hi-- I tend to use the term 'abuse' to cover things that US citizens would easily recognize as torture as well as things that might not, like sleep deprivation, stress positions, etc. I think that all forms of such coercion, including both torture and 'cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment' should be totally prohibited. Though as far I can see from the legal definitions, even these are not two (or four) distinct categories.

So perhaps I tend to talk about 'abuse' sometimes when what is at stake is (as in this case) very, very serious mistreatment... From the description of the event it sounds like they were trying to "punish" Baker for his earlier (well-acted) balkiness. Or maybe they just got out of control... But whatever was the motivation there, what was happening was most certainly a very serious form of abuse.

Recent Posts on JWN
• Realism, war, and pacifism (3)
• Palin's performance: Insulting and very scary (28)
• September 11 and the war in Afghanistan (6)
• US's global dominance 'Reduced': It's nearly official! (1)
• JWN redesign update #1 (2)
• Oliver North??? (5)
• J. Diehl criticizing Saakashvili (3)
• Peres warns against attacking Iran (0)
• Georgia-Hizbullah: Dept. of Delicious Ironies (2)
• US probing Russian Red Lines in Georgia (0)
• Women discuss Sarah Palin (26)
• New vistas-- personal, and blog-related (12)
• The longterm status of Georgia: Challenges ahead (20)
• Text of the draft Iraq-US SOFA (10)
• HRW revising its Russian cluster bomb accusations (11)
• International tensions and the US election (9)
• Iraq: Another Quaker in the 'Red Zone' (3)
• HRW's flawed 'Research' on Georgian cluster bombs (20)
• More on China in Iraq (12)
• Post on China in US occupied zones-- at Japan Focus (0)
• Palin and the 3 a.m. phone call (39)
• China and Iraq (4)
• Egyptian delegation to break Gaza siege (2)
• Waiting for Gustav (5)
• Italy gives Libya $$ compensation for colonial rule (17)
• China buys in to Iraqi, Afghan end-games (15)
• "Resolution": Palin's goal in Iraq (8)
• China's way of 'Emerging' (6)
• A note on US politics (6)
• Conway does a Dannatt (sort of) (7)
• China gets Iraq oil deal (6)
• Rest-of-world saving US from recession? (5)
• Russia and the world (12)
• Milanovic: From Global Trade to Global War (5)
• The return of geography (3)
• Still no US-Iraq security agreement (yawn) (2)
• Iraq-US: More disagreement than 'Agreement' (23)
• NATO's supply lines in Afghanistan (27)
• My CSM piece on the big-picture implications of Georgia (21)
• Mahbubani on western hypocrisy, etc. (5)
• Condi in Baghdad: YES on a timetable (aspirational) (8)
• More on NATO, etc. (14)
• NATO's crisis (8)
• And another thing about Finland (23)
• Where in the world is... Ban Ki-Moon? (22)
• Russian military assessment: New arms race? (26)
• And now for a little audio (0)
• Yglesias nails McCain (4)
• Sarkozy's ceasefire, Georgia's future (22)
• Georgia crisis and the shifting global balance (0)