What to do with $119.4 billion


Posted by Helena Cobban
June 1, 2004 7:57 PM EST | Link
Filed in Antiwar

The AP wire has a great little story that just came across my transom. It starts by reminding us that, "Congress and President Bush have so far provided $119.4 billion for the war in Iraq." And then, it gives a few examples of what that sum could buy.

Well, in the interests of "fair use" (!) I shan't reproduce the whole story here. But let's just note that that bunch of dough could pay tuition, room, and board to send 748,495 people--nearly the whole population of of Jacksonville, Florida-- to Harvard University for four years.

Or, it could buy a median-price ($174,100) U.S. home for 685,813 people-- slightly more than all the residents of Austin, Texas. One home for EACH of them, man, woman, and child, that is.

I hope your local newspaper carries the whole AP story, with the rest of its truly eye-opening examples.

Here's the thing, though. The story also notes that, "If the $119.4 billion were divided evenly among Iraq's estimated 25 million residents, each would get $4,776. That would be eight times the country's $600 per capita income."

So here's my question:

Where the heck has all that money gone to?

Or, more to the point, What proportion of it ended up in the hands of Halliburton and other private contractors?

And heck, while we're in the realm of statistics, did you know that the entire amount of overseas development aid disbursed by the US in 2001 was only $11.43 billion? (More than $3 billion of that went to well-known impoversished country Israel; so let's say that $8.43 billion went to more truly needy nations.)

If you want a truly obscene window on what $119.4 billion means in international affairs, I just worked out that that sum is greater than the entire year-2001 GDP registered in all of the world's 25 poorest countries put together. Those countries (Gambia through Sierra Leone in the UNDP's Human Development Report 2003) are home to 440 million of God's children.



Comments
Comment from... S. Muhlberger, at June 1, 2004 09:05 PM:

Back about the time the general American public was getting disillusioned about the Vietnam war, Art Buchwald, usually considered a humorist, suggested that it would be more effective to drop dollars on Vietnam than bombs. Unfortunately this was never tried.

Comment from... Shirin, at June 2, 2004 02:36 AM:

How many Iraqis could have received the food and medical care they need, and the education they deserve with the money that has been used to destroy their country?

Comment from... Edward, at June 2, 2004 11:12 AM:

Helena,

I support your anti-torture effort and I hope your article stirs things up. I don't know if you are familiar with Alfred McCoy, but he has written an article about CIA research into torture you might find interesting at

http://www.counterpunch.org/mccoy05292004.html

I live near you, near Lexington. I have been talking with some people about visiting our congressional offices to discuss Iraq and you are welcome to join us. It could actually be more effective, however, if a separate delegation from Charlottesville met with these offices. We can discuss this if you are interested.

Comment from... Edward, at June 2, 2004 11:14 AM:

Oops-- I meant to post the previous message under the torture thread.

Comment from... Edward, at June 2, 2004 11:20 AM:

There was an article I read somewhere that determined only about $200 million of the reconstruction money had reached Iraq. I wish I could remember the source. This sum is certainly less then the Iraqi money the U.S. has seized.

Comment from... penis enlargement, at June 27, 2004 08:32 PM:

Does love equal hell?

Recent Posts on JWN
• Realism, war, and pacifism (3)
• Palin's performance: Insulting and very scary (28)
• September 11 and the war in Afghanistan (6)
• US's global dominance 'Reduced': It's nearly official! (1)
• JWN redesign update #1 (2)
• Oliver North??? (5)
• J. Diehl criticizing Saakashvili (3)
• Peres warns against attacking Iran (0)
• Georgia-Hizbullah: Dept. of Delicious Ironies (2)
• US probing Russian Red Lines in Georgia (0)
• Women discuss Sarah Palin (26)
• New vistas-- personal, and blog-related (12)
• The longterm status of Georgia: Challenges ahead (20)
• Text of the draft Iraq-US SOFA (10)
• HRW revising its Russian cluster bomb accusations (11)
• International tensions and the US election (9)
• Iraq: Another Quaker in the 'Red Zone' (3)
• HRW's flawed 'Research' on Georgian cluster bombs (20)
• More on China in Iraq (12)
• Post on China in US occupied zones-- at Japan Focus (0)
• Palin and the 3 a.m. phone call (39)
• China and Iraq (4)
• Egyptian delegation to break Gaza siege (2)
• Waiting for Gustav (5)
• Italy gives Libya $$ compensation for colonial rule (17)
• China buys in to Iraqi, Afghan end-games (15)
• "Resolution": Palin's goal in Iraq (8)
• China's way of 'Emerging' (6)
• A note on US politics (6)
• Conway does a Dannatt (sort of) (7)
• China gets Iraq oil deal (6)
• Rest-of-world saving US from recession? (5)
• Russia and the world (12)
• Milanovic: From Global Trade to Global War (5)
• The return of geography (3)
• Still no US-Iraq security agreement (yawn) (2)
• Iraq-US: More disagreement than 'Agreement' (23)
• NATO's supply lines in Afghanistan (27)
• My CSM piece on the big-picture implications of Georgia (21)
• Mahbubani on western hypocrisy, etc. (5)
• Condi in Baghdad: YES on a timetable (aspirational) (8)
• More on NATO, etc. (14)
• NATO's crisis (8)
• And another thing about Finland (23)
• Where in the world is... Ban Ki-Moon? (22)
• Russian military assessment: New arms race? (26)
• And now for a little audio (0)
• Yglesias nails McCain (4)
• Sarkozy's ceasefire, Georgia's future (22)
• Georgia crisis and the shifting global balance (0)