What to do with $119.4 billion


Posted by Helena Cobban
June 1, 2004 7:57 PM EST | Link
Filed in Antiwar

The AP wire has a great little story that just came across my transom. It starts by reminding us that, "Congress and President Bush have so far provided $119.4 billion for the war in Iraq." And then, it gives a few examples of what that sum could buy.

Well, in the interests of "fair use" (!) I shan't reproduce the whole story here. But let's just note that that bunch of dough could pay tuition, room, and board to send 748,495 people--nearly the whole population of of Jacksonville, Florida-- to Harvard University for four years.

Or, it could buy a median-price ($174,100) U.S. home for 685,813 people-- slightly more than all the residents of Austin, Texas. One home for EACH of them, man, woman, and child, that is.

I hope your local newspaper carries the whole AP story, with the rest of its truly eye-opening examples.

Here's the thing, though. The story also notes that, "If the $119.4 billion were divided evenly among Iraq's estimated 25 million residents, each would get $4,776. That would be eight times the country's $600 per capita income."

So here's my question:

Where the heck has all that money gone to?

Or, more to the point, What proportion of it ended up in the hands of Halliburton and other private contractors?

And heck, while we're in the realm of statistics, did you know that the entire amount of overseas development aid disbursed by the US in 2001 was only $11.43 billion? (More than $3 billion of that went to well-known impoversished country Israel; so let's say that $8.43 billion went to more truly needy nations.)

If you want a truly obscene window on what $119.4 billion means in international affairs, I just worked out that that sum is greater than the entire year-2001 GDP registered in all of the world's 25 poorest countries put together. Those countries (Gambia through Sierra Leone in the UNDP's Human Development Report 2003) are home to 440 million of God's children.



Comments
Comment from... S. Muhlberger, at June 1, 2004 09:05 PM:

Back about the time the general American public was getting disillusioned about the Vietnam war, Art Buchwald, usually considered a humorist, suggested that it would be more effective to drop dollars on Vietnam than bombs. Unfortunately this was never tried.

Comment from... Shirin, at June 2, 2004 02:36 AM:

How many Iraqis could have received the food and medical care they need, and the education they deserve with the money that has been used to destroy their country?

Comment from... Edward, at June 2, 2004 11:12 AM:

Helena,

I support your anti-torture effort and I hope your article stirs things up. I don't know if you are familiar with Alfred McCoy, but he has written an article about CIA research into torture you might find interesting at

http://www.counterpunch.org/mccoy05292004.html

I live near you, near Lexington. I have been talking with some people about visiting our congressional offices to discuss Iraq and you are welcome to join us. It could actually be more effective, however, if a separate delegation from Charlottesville met with these offices. We can discuss this if you are interested.

Comment from... Edward, at June 2, 2004 11:14 AM:

Oops-- I meant to post the previous message under the torture thread.

Comment from... Edward, at June 2, 2004 11:20 AM:

There was an article I read somewhere that determined only about $200 million of the reconstruction money had reached Iraq. I wish I could remember the source. This sum is certainly less then the Iraqi money the U.S. has seized.

Comment from... penis enlargement, at June 27, 2004 08:32 PM:

Does love equal hell?

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)