Gender and whistleblowing


Posted by Helena Cobban
February 27, 2004 11:13 AM EST | Link
Filed in Culture

Katherine Gun, Clare Short, Jane Turner,* Sherron Watkins,** hundreds of female service members now in the Gulf...

What do all these people have in common?

They are all female and they have all been whistleblowers on major abuses of the public trust that have been undertaken by supposedly responsible people in their own workplaces.

Is this a trend? How might we account for it?

I raised this question over our morning coffee today with Bill, the spouse.

"Maybe women are more honest?" he speculated. (What a sweetheart!)

"Or maybe," I said, "many of these abuses are things that are done in some kind of a good-ol'-boys culture in the workplace, and the women have never been invited to become part of that? In fact, I'm sure a lot of women in all these organizations have had major battles of their own trying to deal with the good ol' boys... So really, you wouldn't expect them to have any investment in good-ol'-boy culture, would you?"

Anyway, it's an interesting question. What do you JWN readers think?

---
* FBI agent, reported on a theft by another FBI agent from the wreckage of the World Trade Center. FBI responded by trying to dismiss her. (Today's WaPo, p.A11. Hate their new registration system so not putting in link.)
** Revealed some of Ken Lay's misdoings at Enron



Comments
Comment from... Vivion, at February 27, 2004 06:24 PM:

Interesting question. I left a high-paced, high-paying career in high-tech after I realized that my bosses were asking me to cross ethical -- but not legal -- lines. Later, the company came under SEC investigation. I have no idea if I would have had the presence of mind or guts to blow the whistle had I known definitively about some of the financial fudging I suspected. But the fact that I never was able to adjust to the boys club meant that I never felt any particular loyalty or ownership. I suspect that's true of a lot of women.

Comment from... Marine's Girl, at February 28, 2004 02:20 AM:

Karen Kwiatkowski too!

Comment from... No Preference, at February 28, 2004 06:20 AM:

What an embarrassing question.

My first thought takes me back to grade school, where the girls were less likely to be "bad".

Comment from... helena, at February 28, 2004 08:21 AM:

Vivion-- what an intriguing story. maybe you cd write a bit more about it (for well-remunerated publication!!) including the 'boys club' aspect of it. I'm sure there IS a gender dimesnion to this worth exploring...

MG-- hi! Thanks for putting Karen K into the mix. Yes, of course she belongs there! I shd write something w/ some links to some of her stuff sometime but never get the time to. Maybe I cd just link to a couple of your posts about her.

No Pref-- I'm guessing wildly here, maybe a male poster? Kindergarten, yes, I bet it does all go back to there somehow, but yr view of the girls there as "goodie-goodies" is interesting...

Comment from... Vivion, at March 1, 2004 08:37 AM:

Helena,
Are you serious? I am trying to establish myself as a free-lance writer as we speak -- what suggestions might you have in this regard?

Comment from... Doug, at March 5, 2004 09:27 AM:

One contributing factor might be differences in the way parents respond to girls and boys who "tell on" siblings.

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)