Gender and whistleblowing


Posted by Helena Cobban
February 27, 2004 11:13 AM EST | Link
Filed in Culture

Katherine Gun, Clare Short, Jane Turner,* Sherron Watkins,** hundreds of female service members now in the Gulf...

What do all these people have in common?

They are all female and they have all been whistleblowers on major abuses of the public trust that have been undertaken by supposedly responsible people in their own workplaces.

Is this a trend? How might we account for it?

I raised this question over our morning coffee today with Bill, the spouse.

"Maybe women are more honest?" he speculated. (What a sweetheart!)

"Or maybe," I said, "many of these abuses are things that are done in some kind of a good-ol'-boys culture in the workplace, and the women have never been invited to become part of that? In fact, I'm sure a lot of women in all these organizations have had major battles of their own trying to deal with the good ol' boys... So really, you wouldn't expect them to have any investment in good-ol'-boy culture, would you?"

Anyway, it's an interesting question. What do you JWN readers think?

---
* FBI agent, reported on a theft by another FBI agent from the wreckage of the World Trade Center. FBI responded by trying to dismiss her. (Today's WaPo, p.A11. Hate their new registration system so not putting in link.)
** Revealed some of Ken Lay's misdoings at Enron



Comments
Comment from... Vivion, at February 27, 2004 06:24 PM:

Interesting question. I left a high-paced, high-paying career in high-tech after I realized that my bosses were asking me to cross ethical -- but not legal -- lines. Later, the company came under SEC investigation. I have no idea if I would have had the presence of mind or guts to blow the whistle had I known definitively about some of the financial fudging I suspected. But the fact that I never was able to adjust to the boys club meant that I never felt any particular loyalty or ownership. I suspect that's true of a lot of women.

Comment from... Marine's Girl, at February 28, 2004 02:20 AM:

Karen Kwiatkowski too!

Comment from... No Preference, at February 28, 2004 06:20 AM:

What an embarrassing question.

My first thought takes me back to grade school, where the girls were less likely to be "bad".

Comment from... helena, at February 28, 2004 08:21 AM:

Vivion-- what an intriguing story. maybe you cd write a bit more about it (for well-remunerated publication!!) including the 'boys club' aspect of it. I'm sure there IS a gender dimesnion to this worth exploring...

MG-- hi! Thanks for putting Karen K into the mix. Yes, of course she belongs there! I shd write something w/ some links to some of her stuff sometime but never get the time to. Maybe I cd just link to a couple of your posts about her.

No Pref-- I'm guessing wildly here, maybe a male poster? Kindergarten, yes, I bet it does all go back to there somehow, but yr view of the girls there as "goodie-goodies" is interesting...

Comment from... Vivion, at March 1, 2004 08:37 AM:

Helena,
Are you serious? I am trying to establish myself as a free-lance writer as we speak -- what suggestions might you have in this regard?

Comment from... Doug, at March 5, 2004 09:27 AM:

One contributing factor might be differences in the way parents respond to girls and boys who "tell on" siblings.

Recent Posts on JWN
• Realism, war, and pacifism (3)
• Palin's performance: Insulting and very scary (28)
• September 11 and the war in Afghanistan (6)
• US's global dominance 'Reduced': It's nearly official! (1)
• JWN redesign update #1 (2)
• Oliver North??? (5)
• J. Diehl criticizing Saakashvili (3)
• Peres warns against attacking Iran (0)
• Georgia-Hizbullah: Dept. of Delicious Ironies (2)
• US probing Russian Red Lines in Georgia (0)
• Women discuss Sarah Palin (26)
• New vistas-- personal, and blog-related (12)
• The longterm status of Georgia: Challenges ahead (20)
• Text of the draft Iraq-US SOFA (10)
• HRW revising its Russian cluster bomb accusations (11)
• International tensions and the US election (9)
• Iraq: Another Quaker in the 'Red Zone' (3)
• HRW's flawed 'Research' on Georgian cluster bombs (20)
• More on China in Iraq (12)
• Post on China in US occupied zones-- at Japan Focus (0)
• Palin and the 3 a.m. phone call (39)
• China and Iraq (4)
• Egyptian delegation to break Gaza siege (2)
• Waiting for Gustav (5)
• Italy gives Libya $$ compensation for colonial rule (17)
• China buys in to Iraqi, Afghan end-games (15)
• "Resolution": Palin's goal in Iraq (8)
• China's way of 'Emerging' (6)
• A note on US politics (6)
• Conway does a Dannatt (sort of) (7)
• China gets Iraq oil deal (6)
• Rest-of-world saving US from recession? (5)
• Russia and the world (12)
• Milanovic: From Global Trade to Global War (5)
• The return of geography (3)
• Still no US-Iraq security agreement (yawn) (2)
• Iraq-US: More disagreement than 'Agreement' (23)
• NATO's supply lines in Afghanistan (27)
• My CSM piece on the big-picture implications of Georgia (21)
• Mahbubani on western hypocrisy, etc. (5)
• Condi in Baghdad: YES on a timetable (aspirational) (8)
• More on NATO, etc. (14)
• NATO's crisis (8)
• And another thing about Finland (23)
• Where in the world is... Ban Ki-Moon? (22)
• Russian military assessment: New arms race? (26)
• And now for a little audio (0)
• Yglesias nails McCain (4)
• Sarkozy's ceasefire, Georgia's future (22)
• Georgia crisis and the shifting global balance (0)