Geneva Accord-- strengths and weaknesses


Posted by Helena Cobban
December 1, 2003 9:33 PM EST | Link
Filed in Palestine 2003-05

The 'Geneva Accord' signed today between non-governmental negotiators from Israel and Palestine was a great achievement, despite its many evident limitations.

Chief among the latter is the fact that neither of the two negotiating teams has any governmental mandate to negotiate. (Though it should be noted that Yasser Abed Rabboo, unlike Yossi Beilin, is a close associate of the two persons wielding leadership in his own society.) There also seem to me to be some weaknesses in the content of the plan. But these are minor compared with its achievements. The main achievements are, in my humble opinion, threefold:

    (1) The ability of these two teams to reach agreement in spite of the continuing levels of violence their societies suffer from, and despite the tepidity of support coming from the world's sole superpower, shows that there is some hope, and some good reason to keep hope alive.

    (2) On both sides, it shows the doubters that despite all their hopelessness and cynicism it is still not true to say that "There is no-one to talk to on the 'other side'. All that people 'over there' ever understand is the language of force, not reason." Instead, yes, there is someone to talk to; and reasoned discussion can lead toward a sufficiently good--even if still not 'perfect'--outcome.

    (3) The single greatest achievement of the accord: to point definitively to the need to define an agreed "final outcome", and then work perhaps incrementally towards it, rather than continuing to toil endlessly and without gain over ever smaller and smaller subsets of the interim.

    As the (upcoming in February) report of the International Quaker Working Party on the Israel-Palestine Conflict argues, the obsession with incrementalism that has plagued all US efforts to broker Israeli-Palestinian peace for the past 25 years always led to a decrease in confidence between the two peoples rather than the increase in confidence that its advocates always promised. Returning the focus to finding a final outcome that the two peoples can both live with, and then working towards it, is the only possible way out of the current mess.

So thanks, Yasser and Yossi, for achieving those things. The language of negotiation and compromise is the only thing that will bring this conflict and the immense suffering it continues to inflict on both palestinians and Israelis, to an end.



Comments
Comment from... Hirsch Claudia , at March 17, 2004 01:44 AM:

Study without thinking, and you are blind; think without studying, and you are in danger.

Comment from... Keating Erin , at May 19, 2004 12:50 PM:

For every action there is an equal and opposite government program.

Comment from... Smith Gavin , at June 2, 2004 11:52 AM:

Do give books - religious or otherwise - for Christmas. They're never fattening, seldom sinful, and permanently personal.

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)