What Condi told Chalocchio


Posted by Helena Cobban
October 4, 2003 11:01 AM EST | Link
Filed in Iraq 2003 thru June 2005

According to the L.A. Times Condi met Chaolocchio in NYC in late Sept., and then again in DC September 30:

    "She was instructed to tell him to behave. She stressed how unhelpful it was for Iraqis to be enunciating positions that were personally embarrassing for the president, who was the strongest advocate of a new regime in Baghdad," said a senior U.S. official. "She was blunt."
That story, by Robin Wright and Maggie Farley, ran in the LAT yesterday.

(Thanks to Juan Cole for pointing me to that piece. Robin W, who has a great, decades-long track record of reporting and writing about Iran and Iraq, has another good story in the LAT today, saying that Iran is offering some reconstruction aid to Iraq. That development was, of course, totally predictable-- indeed, actually predicted long ago by yrs truly. Plus, it has considerable weight of sheer logistical/political logic behind it.)

Anyway, back to the story on Chalocchio, Condi and the UN: it notes that when Chalo gave a long address at the UN Thursday, he was actually not any more the "President" of the Iraqi Governing Council, whose presidency had rotated away from him Oct. 1.

It also has an interesting quote or two from former Chalocchio boosters close to the administration who articulated their sense that they had been seriously let down by him. (Duh! Ask hundreds of thousands of small Jordanian investors who felt the same way 20 years ago when his so-called "Petra Bank" ran away with their life savings... )

The story quotes Henri Barkey, a well-connected former State Dept staffer who, it says, once worked with Chalo, as now saying,

    He didn't deliver. Once we got into Iraq, intelligence provided-- whether on weapons of mass destruction or other issues-- could be tested. We began to realize that all these things he was telling us were not exactly correct.



Comments
Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)