Max Cleland on Iraq


Posted by Helena Cobban
September 22, 2003 1:17 PM EST | Link
Filed in Antiwar

This, from former Senator Max Cleland, thanks to Juan Cole:


    Welcome to Vietnam, Mr. President. Sorry you didn't go when you had the chance.

Read Cleland's whole, excellent op-ed in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, here.



Comments
Comment from... Vivion, at September 23, 2003 08:38 AM:

Barbara Tuchman included Viet Nam as one of the historical case studies of her book, "The March of Folly." Her definition of folly refers to governments that make decisions counter to their national interests, despite active disagreement prior to those decisions, and the existence of feasible alternatives.

If you assume that (1) easy access to plentiful oil; (2) the "remaking" of the Middle East in a new, democratic image; and (3) the reduction of terrorism all represented our chief national interests prior to the war, then we have not only failed on all counts, we have produced conditions that have resulted in quite the opposite.

Given that there was much disagreement about the war beforehand -- including from within the armed forces -- and any number of alternatives were put forward, I would say we have committed folly by any estimation.

The question now is, not whether we have furthered our interests, but whether any good can come out of the situation in Iraq at this point at all.

Comment from... Pastrami Sandwich, at February 8, 2004 11:44 AM:

Oops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl

Recent Posts on JWN
• Realism, war, and pacifism (3)
• Palin's performance: Insulting and very scary (28)
• September 11 and the war in Afghanistan (6)
• US's global dominance 'Reduced': It's nearly official! (1)
• JWN redesign update #1 (2)
• Oliver North??? (5)
• J. Diehl criticizing Saakashvili (3)
• Peres warns against attacking Iran (0)
• Georgia-Hizbullah: Dept. of Delicious Ironies (2)
• US probing Russian Red Lines in Georgia (0)
• Women discuss Sarah Palin (26)
• New vistas-- personal, and blog-related (12)
• The longterm status of Georgia: Challenges ahead (20)
• Text of the draft Iraq-US SOFA (10)
• HRW revising its Russian cluster bomb accusations (11)
• International tensions and the US election (9)
• Iraq: Another Quaker in the 'Red Zone' (3)
• HRW's flawed 'Research' on Georgian cluster bombs (20)
• More on China in Iraq (12)
• Post on China in US occupied zones-- at Japan Focus (0)
• Palin and the 3 a.m. phone call (39)
• China and Iraq (4)
• Egyptian delegation to break Gaza siege (2)
• Waiting for Gustav (5)
• Italy gives Libya $$ compensation for colonial rule (17)
• China buys in to Iraqi, Afghan end-games (15)
• "Resolution": Palin's goal in Iraq (8)
• China's way of 'Emerging' (6)
• A note on US politics (6)
• Conway does a Dannatt (sort of) (7)
• China gets Iraq oil deal (6)
• Rest-of-world saving US from recession? (5)
• Russia and the world (12)
• Milanovic: From Global Trade to Global War (5)
• The return of geography (3)
• Still no US-Iraq security agreement (yawn) (2)
• Iraq-US: More disagreement than 'Agreement' (23)
• NATO's supply lines in Afghanistan (27)
• My CSM piece on the big-picture implications of Georgia (21)
• Mahbubani on western hypocrisy, etc. (5)
• Condi in Baghdad: YES on a timetable (aspirational) (8)
• More on NATO, etc. (14)
• NATO's crisis (8)
• And another thing about Finland (23)
• Where in the world is... Ban Ki-Moon? (22)
• Russian military assessment: New arms race? (26)
• And now for a little audio (0)
• Yglesias nails McCain (4)
• Sarkozy's ceasefire, Georgia's future (22)
• Georgia crisis and the shifting global balance (0)