Bush (speech) notes


Posted by Helena Cobban
September 8, 2003 9:07 AM EST | Link
Filed in Hawkwatch

Reactions to Sunday night's speech:

(1) Back to the scared-deer look. Makes you sorry for the guy.

(2) Notably peevish and ungracious toward the UN. UN has "an opportunity, and the responsibility" to help out. So says Nanny Bush. But where was even one moment of reaching out to the United Nations by, for example, expressing his sympathy over the loss of Sergio de Mello and the other UN people there? Bush had actually met Sergio, after all... A couple of sentences of memories of the man's human qualities would have spoken volumes to key audiences both inside the US and overseas.

(3) Still trying the tired old trick of labeling all actions he doesn't like as "terrorism". Has the guy read read no history??? (Silly question, Helena!) But just for the record, I can say throughout my entire lifetime, from watching the British dismantle their empire until now, it's notable how often imperial powers fall into this particular discourse of (anti-)terrorism. Why, for the pillars of the apartheid regime, Nelson Mandela was for decades the "arch-terrorist"! This discourse not only doesn't solve problems, it actually aggravates them, because the imperial power ends up using highly counter-productive means to react to understandable and quite predictable political setbacks.

Oh well, I'm off to Richmond, VA today to give a talk. Also have to write a CSM column for Thursday (9/11). Better stop now.



Comments
Comment from... Pastrami Sandwich, at February 8, 2004 11:50 AM:

Oops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl

Recent Posts on JWN
• My IPS piece on dimming peace prospects (1)
• Rahm Emanuel's disturbing view of US role (26)
• Obama's peacemaking pledge-- to the world (35)
• Obama: Peace in US interest (5)
• Discussing Palestine, Israel, Iraq on Bloggingheads (0)
• Long knives, Washington, Afghanistan, part 2 (7)
• Long knives out in Washington over Afghanistan (3)
• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb responds (10)
• NATO and Lebanon (16)
• IPS piece on Obama-Netanyahu tussle over priorities (0)
• Gaza police and noncombatant immunity (46)
• Gaza, the Obama administration, and the present (4)
• Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, "benchmarks" (2)
• Barak: Iran not existential threat (0)
• Garlasco, suspended with full pay (15)
• Me, speaking Sept 24 at Middle East Institute (3)
• Goldstone Commission reports on Gaza-war war-crimes (23)
• Another blunt No from Netanyahu (30)
• Ramadan t.v. offerings, 2009 (2)
• I-P: Borders first-- and fast? (4)
• A testimony the world needs to hear (2)
• Garlasco, part 3 (32)
• Malley on refugees, settlers, etc (7)
• In 2009, as 2001: US needs Iran, Russia (3)
• IPS piece on the rights war over Gaza (3)
• Garlasco, part 2 (20)
• Continuing bad news for US/NATO in Afghanistan (4)
• Marc Garlasco's little "hobby" (71)
• Trashing one-staters with Hussein Ibish (12)
• 500 new settlement homes in Jerusalem... (12)
• When election results are disputed: Afghanistan, etc (6)
• B'tselem's figures on Gaza assault toll (8)
• American power has limits? Who knew? (13)
• Israel's assault on Gaza: The final toll (1)
• Hamas-related negotiations moving forward? (1)
• Sweden, and the Israel-linked organs story (18)
• Qtube-- what a resource! (2)
• Cook and Elam on Israel's organ-removal problems (48)
• "The White House regrets... " (48)
• Lessons from the Soviet experience in Afghanistan (9)
• IPS analysis of Iraq and related regional tensions (1)
• Visser goes 2.0 (8)
• More on Norway's targeted divestment (14)
• Pat Lang on the dangerous, continued rise of 'COIN'-mania (8)
• Bravo, Norway! (6)
• An exiled Palestinian visits "home" (20)
• Israel releases nine of 32 Hamas legislators (2)
• Why Blair wants Dahlan to retake Gaza? (0)
• Afghanistan debate: The missing international ingredient (9)
• State-building: Palestine (3)